PDA

View Full Version : LOVE IS STRANGE (Ira Sachs 2014)



Chris Knipp
08-31-2014, 02:53 PM
Ira Sachs: Love Is Strange (2014)


http://www.chrisknipp.com/newpictures/lovestrange.jpg
Alfred Molina and John Lithgow in Love Is Strange

Vicissitudes of gay marriage

While Ira Sachs' last movie, Keep the Lights On (http://www.cinescene.com/knipp/keepthelightson.htm), dealt with the ten years of a painfully dysfuctional and doomed gay relationship, his new one, his most mainstream-friendly and probably most successful yet, goes quite the other way. Love Is Strange focuses on two men who've lived in harmony for just ages. To start thing off on the right track, they're played by two actors who are about as good as it gets. As George and Ben, Alfred Molina and John Lithgow, longtime friends in real life, make their on screen relationship look and feel as warm, loving, and lived in as has ever been seen in movies about gay men. The movie opens with George and Ben huddled together comfortably in a bed that isn't large. They get up like any old couple, fussy, a bit preoccupied, as if the day is nothing special. But it is. It's their wedding day, because after 39 years together they've decided in New York City to tie the knot officially. Such a ceremony is both moving and a bit pro-forma, acknowledging something that's well known to everyone around them, giving them a welcome chance to celebrate publicly, at an after party in their comfy apartment among friends and neighbors, a union whose solidity and love their straight friends may well envy. But ironically, things go bad from here on.

Everything about the specifics of this film is convincing and enjoyable to watch from scene to scene. Sachs is in full command of craft and lucky in more than just Lithgow and Molina, though except for the coolly intense young Charlie Tahan as Jerry, son of a close relative of Ben's, and the astonishingly specific Marisa Tomei as Jerry's novelist mom, most of the cast are underused. As for the larger outlines, though Sachs and his co-writer Mauricio Zacharias (who also collaborated on Keep the Lights On) deliver a rich sense of milieu and leave the actors room to improvise, one may question the credibility of the trajectory, or its necessity, or wonder what it's supposed to mean. Surely not that gay marriage, so much striven for by activists, is only a source of pain? Nonetheless, though the action gets a bit too weepy, gushy, or fatalistic at moments, it is a continual pleasure to see American almost-mainstream filmmaking this textured, mature, and real.

In the event, George, the breadwinner (Ben is a painter who may be good but isn't a big success), loses his job very soon after the marriage ceremony. He teaches music and directs the choir at a Catholic school whose headmaster is forced to let him go when his now official homosexuality gains the attention of the diocese. Faced with this cutoff of funds and the cruel demands of New York City real estate Ben and George feel obliged, against the protests of their coop partners and friends, to sell their apartment immediately and at a terrible (and almost preposterous) loss.

While George searches frustratingly for work and the couple look into the tricky prospects of a cheap place to rent, they find free interim lodging apart, George with a rowdy young gay couple in their building who're both cops (Cheyenne Jackson and Manny Perez), who George calls "the policewomen"; Ben with his work-obsessed nephew Elliot (Darren Burrows) and his novelist wife Kate (Tomei). Ben proceeds to drive Kate nuts with his friendly but pointless chatter (these scenes take a bit long to make their point), and his kipping in the bottom bunk in son Joey's room (Tahan) is a huge annoyance to this teenage boy, whose relatiohnship with his new and only friend Vlad (Eric Tabach) may be more than meets the eye. The only significant subplot is Joey's troubled and uncertain story, as such a boy's might be in real life, leaving us hanging as to whether for Joey Vlad is love or obsession or simply the dangerous and tempting friendship of a lonely kid. Ben is exiled to Brooklyn with his nephew's family, but the roof of the apartment building provides a pretty urban landscape view, and when he finally relaxes, leaves Kate to finish her novel, and takes up the brush again, it's to paint Vlad posing in singlet with skateboard in front of Manhattan skyline on that roof.

It's surprising how much danger and complexity and emotional depth Sachs & Co. draw from these little events. A New York story to the core, Love Is Strange could have the subtitle, And Real Estate is Brutal. Ben and George are a New York couple. They will not move upstate, however available employment and cheaper housing might be there. Of course if they'd done so, or just found a double mattress to share somewhere, none of this would have happened. Some of the action, despite the lovely, precise observation of behavior, seems off kilter or slightly wrong. But we'll remember Lithgow and Molina together, and apart, in just this way forever now.

For more background and social perspective, see Armond White's review (http://www.out.com/entertainment/armond-white/2014/08/21/love-strange-teaches-respect-gay-elders)for Out ("Love Is Strange teaches respect for gay elders").

Love Is Strange, 94 mins., debuted at Sundance, January 2014, showing at a dozen or so international festivals. Released by Sony Pictures Classics in rolling-out limited release, it entered theaters 22 August 2014. Watched for this review at Landmark Shattuck Cinemas, Berkeley, California when it opened in the Bay Area 29 August.

cinemabon
09-08-2014, 09:35 AM
The moment I started to read your review, it reminded me of a landmark film controversial in its day but legendary, nonetheless. "Staircase" (1969) involved two A-list actors taking on the taboo subject of an aging gay couple (Richard Burton and Rex Harrison) directed by AA winner Stanley Donen (Singing in the Rain fame and others). Donen is still alive and partnered with Elaine May - writer and comedienne. The film bombed as it was considered in "bad taste" at the time. I wonder what critics would feel about it now. I just remember the press and public panned the film because of its subject matter. Roger Ebert panned it but he was just a boy at the time, very early in his career.

Ian McKellen and Derek Jacobi have made an updated version of the aging gay couple in "Vicious" presented on BBC and PBS in America. The show consists mainly of the two insulting one another for laughs. Straight audiences accept it but I wonder how the gay community views such fare.

I would imagine that writers trying to portray an aging gay couple run the risk of always sounding stereotypical - the cattiness, the cruel sexual humor, the petty jealousies. Your review skimmed over the surface as if it were thin ice and anything underneath unbearable.

Attitudes and acting styles regarding gay roles have changed a great deal in the 35 years since "Staircase" (along with other gay films at the time) where gay men were often portrayed as being effeminate and effusive. Many gay "couple" movies have been attempted. Where does this one land in the spectrum of polish?

Chris Knipp
09-08-2014, 10:39 AM
Welcome back, again, cinemabon, hope your writing has been going well and you've had time to see some new films.

Good that you mention STAIRCASE. I haven't seen it though. Armond White mentions it in his review of LOVE IS STRANGE for the gay review OUT, "Make Way for a Gay Way Back Machine: Love Is Strange teaches respect for gay elders.," (http://www.out.com/entertainment/armond-white/2014/08/21/love-strange-teaches-respect-gay-elders) which I referred to above. But your title embraces a misconception: LOVE IS STRANGE is not an "echo of the past."


I would imagine that writers trying to portray an aging gay couple run the risk of always sounding stereotypical - the cattiness, the cruel sexual humor, the petty jealousies. Your review skimmed over the surface as if it were thin ice and anything underneath unbearable. I'm not avoiding mention of cattiness, cruel sexual humor, and petty jealousies. They simply play no part in LOVE IS STRANGE. They are key elements of depressing and now very dated Seventies gay-related movies like FOX AND HIS FRIENDS and a THE BOYS IN THE BAND.

cinemabon
09-08-2014, 08:07 PM
I'm glad to hear that about the film and I'm impressed with your recent array of reviews as always. Kudos, Chris.

Working with an editor can be as tricky as any relationship where trust issues and common ground are often ways to find a solid relationship. In my mind at least, I've found the ideal partner. If this union can produce fruit, I'm certain the vintage will stand the test of the sommelier.

Chris Knipp
09-08-2014, 08:16 PM
Thanks, cinemabon. Glad you've found the ideal working partner. Don't get drunk though on that ideal vintage. Hope you can follow my NYFF coverage -- eventually, anyway. It will begin in just one week, God willing.

cinemabon
09-08-2014, 08:22 PM
I'd rather read your work than play on Facebook, watch episodic television or dabble in some other past time. You bring such insight into your film critiques, that they are a joy to read. My problem is I can't stop. Once I start down your list (especially the film festivals) I have to keep reading. I feel I'm a kid, running behind an adult, trying to keep up - "Hey, Wild Bill... wait fer me!"

As to drinking, I gave it up decades ago. I drank to excess and had to stop to avoid death - that one scary thing that keeps me from being too bad. If I ever tried to indulge in some aberrant behavior, it would consume me. I'll be a teetotaler for life. (sigh)

Chris Knipp
09-08-2014, 08:33 PM
I was just joking about your vintage metaphor and the sommelier. I did not know you'd quit drinking. So did I, but fine wine is the one thing that I miss. I still get mailers from the best wine dealers in the Bay Area to peruse wistfully.

Your compulsive watching of my festival coverage is just what I desire. My coverage itself is compulsive, my tendency especially to see and review every film shown to the press in the three Film Society of Lincoln Center series, Rendez-Vous with French Cinema, New Directors/New Films, and the New York Film Festival. They are all do-able, if one has the time and the accreditation. This will be my tenth NYFF; I began in 2005 when Peter Wilson was Art Director of the Film Society of Lincoln Center, and lured me and facilitated my accreditation. He left the next year, but I continued to come.

In the P&I screenings they show over several weeks each film in each of these three series exclusively to the press. It's an ideal situation and I make the most of it by not missing a screening of the main selections and writing what I hope is a fair and informative review of each selection. There are thirty in the NYFf this year. I will hope to cover a few sidebar items in the retrospective and documentary series that coincide with the NYFf.

You can go at any speed you want (no "Hey Wild Bill" necessary), but I have to keep up with the screening schedule because if I got behind one day I'd never catch up.

P.s. Episodic television can be pretty great, but you can live without Facebook.