PDA

View Full Version : EUROPA REPORT (Sebastián Cordero 2013)



Chris Knipp
08-19-2013, 09:01 PM
Sebastián Cordero: Europa Report (2013)

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640x480q90/537/NggOZN.jpg
DANIEL WU AND ANNAMARIA MARINCA IN EUROPA REPORT

A mission that succeeds, while failing

Ecuadorian filmmaker Sebastián Cordero's space exploration adventure Europa Report (his fifth feature and English-language debut) is the most scientifically authentic and intelligent science fiction movie of the summer. That may not exactly be thrilling news. Some may well prefer the teeming stack of zombies pouring over an Israeli wall and the charismatic presence of Brad Pitt in World War Z. Or the heavy-handed but ultra-sincere politics and relentless intensity of Elysium -- fueled by a muscular and shaven-headed Matt Damon as a prole on a trashed Earth struggling to survive radiation sickness -- may understandably be your thing. Europa Report doesn't provide the kind of fun either of those movies offers. But apart from its cunning use of the found footage device, Cordero's movie has something really interesting and hopeful to say about space, and it says it using expertise relayed to the filmmakers direct from NASA.

The world inside the space ship of Europa is a big space, but not that big, since this ain't 2001, and therefore it's also claustrophobic, full of panels and dials, with side rooms or compartments for team members to eat and sleep. Something has already gone wrong with the mission; we know that from the start. On the other hand, since this footage has become available to control back on earth, it provides ostensibly extraordinary data. The mission was to fly to Europa, one of the moons of Jupiter where there is a frozen surface that may contain water. The goal once there was to determine if there are indeed the conditions favorable to life there, or life itself in some form. We don't know exactly how all this data has come to us but we're watching flickering films from eight fixed cameras on board the ship, which we see take off from earth's surface. We also see a tearful chief spokesperson of the earth support team (Embeth Davidtz) and others on a panel giving a presentation about the mission. These are intercut with daily details from the artfully flickering and sputtering cameras, sometimes one at a time, sometimes in multiple split-screen images. The digital pop of the flicker and the jostling split-screens provide a new look.

When the crew gets to Europa, it's not what they expected. And once they begin collecting data, things start to go wrong, with a hint of creepiness making the trajectory reminiscent of that found footage pioneer, Blair Witch Project. Narratively life in outer space hints of "aliens" and that in turn more or less equals "scary things out to get us." However the movie keeps all that suitably mysterious. The excitement that's generated comes partly from hints of life, partly simply from the gradual meltdown of the mission and that old sci-fi theme of the loneliness of outer space. That is a theme more focused upon in Moon, the recent Sam Rockwell vehicle and directorial debut of David Bowie's son Duncan Jonens -- and still a movie that in human terms remains much more interesting. One flaw of Europa Report is that none of its crew members or the unknown actors who play them generates much interest. I was hoping there might be a Sigourney Weaver on board, but of course, there's only one Sigourney Weaver. These folks all have good backgrounds. They are Anamaria Marinca (4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days), Embeth Davidtz (Schindler's List), Sharlto Copley (District 9, Elysium), Christian Camargo (The Hurt Locker), Michael Nyqvist (the Swedish Girl With the Dragon Tattoo and its sequels), and Daniel Wu, of many Chinese films, but despite one older guy who goes a bit rogue (Nyqvist) and a young dad (Copley) who's seriously pining to see his five-year-old son, the script doesn't give them much color or individuality, and that's not good for the audience. We need Ripley.

The lack of a big budget cuts both ways. It's just as well (as in Moon, for that matter) not to have a superabundance of CGI and famous actors and elaborate sets. This puts more focus on what the movie is about and less on superfluous eye candy. On the other hand, let's face it, space travel is an enormously expensive enterprise, and when a space ship has been created for the camera on a small budget it's not going to look quite right (though some may find the production inadequacies nostalgic). With all these limitations, the Europa mission ship soon begins to feel damned claustrophobic, and sometimes, downright boring . Nevertheless all the events recounted toward the latter part of the film seem valid and thought-provoking.

I learn from a review (http://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/archives/2013/08/07/sebastian-corderos-europa-report-nearly-lost-in-orbit-touches-down-in-chicago-on-friday)by Ben Sachs in The Chicago Reader that Cordero (whose other films I haven't seen) likes claustrophobia and anti-climax. Certainly he achieves the former and maybe the latter. It's a first to find yourself feeling maybe these crew members, for all their childlike excitement in some cases at the awesome stuff they're witnessing, might also be realizing what a lot of drudgery there is in this job, as well as loneliness. There's plenty to chew on here. But it's just all so drab. And the music is too loud: space is supposed to be a quiet place.

Europa Report , 90 mins., debuted at the LA Film Festival in June 2013, with an Internet release 27 June and limited US theatrical release beginning 2 August.

tabuno
08-19-2013, 11:11 PM
I feel a bit slighted for this thread to be posted separately from my own post of July 31, 2013 of the same film as if my comments don't deserve side by side comparison.

However, down to the real problem. Regardless of great visual looks and great technical accuracy, it all comes down to story, story, and story and how its told. Otherwise let's just do a speculative documentary about space travel to another planet in IMAX, 3-D and leave it at that. I've already made my observations about how confusing, chaotic, and disorienting this movie is. If one is searching for something more like Chris's selections, than I say Stranded (2001) has the more straightforward, non-fire works storyline but great personal relational depiction of a cerebral sci fi outer space movie.

Chris Knipp
08-19-2013, 11:29 PM
Sorry, tabuno! I had forgotten your original EUROPA REPORT thread and didn't see it since it was down pretty far on the page now. I'd move to your thread, but I can't delete this one now, so let's just stay here.

I do not see your objections at all, though obviously I have mine, which are probably more what a majority of critics, generally favorable, have expressed. I do not think the story line is disjointed, just because it switches back and forth between the present time experts or ground crew mambers' comments on the flight and the found footage of the actual flight. This follows very usual convention and is quite easy to follow and totally normal procedure. But while the movie is strong on scientific accuracy and puts a lot of effort into the found footage effects, the script is lackluster, shown in rather drab characters (not actors; they're quite decent) and nothing showing great imagination or flair. It's still the best recent sci-fi movie because it's intelligent and makes sense. And the critical response reflects that, as indicated in the Metacritic ratings:

After Earth 33
Oblivion 54
Elysium 60
World War Z 63
Europa Report 67

EUROPA REPORT has a very respectable critical rating befitting its quality as a film, but the rating is not through the roof, due to the flaws. This rating, 67, is comparable to THE WAY, WAY BACK, and close to THE BUTLER (66), THE CONJURING (68), or CRYSTAL FAIRY (same score, 67). There are lots of current limited releases listed on Metacritic, 29 to be specific, with much higher scores. However it is a wide release and there are currently only two wide releases with higher Metacritic scores, THE CONJURING (68) and FRUITVALE STATION (85).

STRANDED (2001), which you mention, obviously not the new one with Christian Slater, which appears very ill-starred, sounds indeed interesting, with that cast, and a very logical comparison to EUROPA REPORT. I haven't seen it and it looks like not that many people have, or at least there are not many reviews of it online. However I see that Netflix (which lists it as 2002) does have it and even on instant play. I'm pretty busy with things to watch and write about right now though.

I just watched THE SPECTACULAR NOW, which has a critical rating on Metacritic of 82, and I feel that big difference in my reaction, the rush of pleasure, the sheer wonderment at such good acting, writing, and direction that film filled me with. It's really lovely. The critics are right to rave about THE SPECTACULAR NOW and only give a respectable rating to EUROPA REPORT. But EUROPA REPORT is still a better sci-fi movie than the other ones this summer, in purely sci-fi rather than popcorn movie cineplex terms.

I should have mentioned KUBRICK. As the AV review (good; and they give it a B-) says, his spirit is omnipresnet, and I ought to have said something about the exterior scenes in space and on the moon.

tabuno
09-07-2013, 12:44 AM
I just finished seeing the not so well received Apollo 18 (2011) that I had avoided until now. I have to say I think that compared to Europa Report (2013) and in a huge disagreement with the Apollo 18 film critics and its 5.2 IMDb user rating that Apollo 18 really came across as a superior movie film experience of the pseudo-documentary style, one of the best in my mind. In contrast to Europa Report, I found it much less manipulative that Cloverfield (2008) became like Europa Report and avoiding the over-used cliques of space disasters that Europa Report incorporated making it just another disaster movie in space and a derivative of a scripted reality television episode. Instead, the straight forward story telling of Apollo 18 and its great photographic technique simulating actual NASA footage really won me over.

Even in its boring mundane content, there was a focused emphasis of realism echoing those mundane moments in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Apollo 18 is one of the few, if only movies, to be able to capture the essence of the success of The Blair Witch Project (1999), build on it and create a truly scary movie from the inside out. This movie didn't depend on the shock value ridden horror, occult elements, but on the suggestive ambiance of naked reality.

Chris Knipp
09-07-2013, 01:05 AM
I thought CLOVERFIELD (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?2236-Matt-Reeves-Cloverfield-%282008%29&highlight=cloverfield)a fun trashy movie. We already had a lengthy debate over it and I still regard it as worthwhile. Whether or not it's convincing, it grabs you and holds onto you through its whole violent, vibrant length. It's an experience. I may have gone overboard for it, but I had a good time. I can remember where I saw it in NYC and how I felt walking out of the theater five years ago. As for APOLLO 18 I have not seen it, but the absolutely horrible reviews make me very, very dubious. And David Edelstein, who recommended CLOVERFIELD, calls APOLLO 18 "80 minutes of dead air." Other comments are like "unpleasant when it isnn't dull" , "drab horror," "dumber than a box of moon rocks." You have to be suspicious. Take another look? But to be honest, I dutifully praised EUROPA REPORT for its scientific accuracy but it's not memorable and won't go on any of my best lists other than best worst. I think maybe WORLD WAR Z has a better chance of being remembered now. It's got Brad Pitt in it, radiating charisma. And it's got towering mountains of zombies falling over into walled-off Israel. For a small, think-piece sci-fi movie of recent vintage, MOON still has my top vote.