PDA

View Full Version : AFTER EARTH (M. Knight Shyamalan 2013)



Chris Knipp
06-05-2013, 07:59 PM
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/1892/shyamalan.jpg
JADEN SMITH IN AFTER EARTH

Karate Kid turns space hero

The Shyamalan-Will Smith collaboration starring Will's teenage son has been lambasted by the US critics as egregious nepotism. I will grant you it's a bit silly. But Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of AV Club (http://www.avclub.com/articles/after-earth,98361) points to some redeeming features. "For a $130 million vanity project, After Earth is remarkably lean" and "clean and simple," "a no-frills wilderness survival tale with sci-fi trappings" that most of the time has just two characters on screen with "big chunks" that "pass without dialogue." The 100-minute run-time is also lean by Hollywood blockbuster standards. These are great virtues in the overstuffed world of summer blockbusters. If you can ignore all the negativity surrounding it, After Earth is a boy's adventure story that's fun and satisfying.

This movie may also have resonances for African Americans the white critical community failed to note. The black film critic Armond White (http://www.nyfcc.com/2013/05/after-earth-reviewed-by-armond-white-for-cityarts/) begins by pointing out that "Boys without fathers are the target audience." I was struck by how sensitive After Earth is to the delicate fate of an African American family, torn apart, yet stubbornly and triumphantly warm and loving. A stark opening image of the now hostile Earth even reminded White of lynchings. Not certain white critics saw that. White went on to equate the wild and hostile nature on the Earth of a thousand years hence, which man child Kitai must face, to the ghetto's mean streets. The "ghosting" the father has invented to hide fear White likens to the Mask all blacks wear as described in a poem by Paul Laurence Dunbar. Will and even Jaden have rap chops, and White sees hip hop references here: dad's name, Cypher, is a hip hop term for community. Is all this too ingenious? I don't know, but you can be sure Will and Jaden Smith know they're black. This is not a great movie, but if it's really such a terrible mistake as some claim it certainly comes off remarkably unscathed in the watching.

The setup is indeed simple, and well calculated to appeal to kids. A thousand years from now Cypher Raige (Will Smith) and his 14-year-old son Kitai (Jaden smith) are the sole survivors of a space-ship that crash-lands on Earth. Dad, a severe, emotionally withholding military space travel super-honcho, has wound up with two broken legs and he's fading fast. It's left to Kitai to race 100 kilometers through a now hostile-to-humans nature to find the tail of the ship that contains the inter-planetary distress signal thingy that will save them -- or they die. Father and son are in constant communication, till they're not. Cypher has been an absentee dad, the family has tragedy in its past that flashbacks suggest might have left Kitai with survivor guilt.

Early scenes establish that Kitai, who just failed to get promoted to "ranger" at the space academy, is dying to prove himself to his dad. Dad learns from mom that he's a "sensitive" and "intuitive" boy: in other words, cut him some slack. So dad takes son on a space trip, this gesture paralleling the nepotistic privilege that made the movie. Well now Jaden/Kitai really gets to prove himself to lofty dad. And a lot of the time he looks convincingly scared. I was reminded of how the French actor Tahar Rahim said it was easy to play the terror of his young character thrown into a big Paris jail in Audiard's The Prophet, because he was terrified as a rank beginner to be starring in a film by the famous director. Only Rahim was in his twenties, and Jaden Smith really is only 14. Nonetheless while it's perhaps valid to say Jaden is too young to star in his own blockbuster, stories for kids do give kids starring roles.

This is like an afternoon movie set on a farm or a camping trip, a simple story that normally would be executed with simple means. Instead it's paradoxically set in the prevailing summer blockbuster mode of the sci-fi action flick. Gadgets like Jaden's body suit, constantly changing color to reflect weather and capable of sprouting wings, is silly fun: he must have enjoyed wearing it (and probably sweated a lot too). Whoever designed the space ship and dwellings had an outré sense of style. They're all sort of like things made of cloth and bones. Most of the beasties Kitai must face are like speeded up Nature Channel stuff, with just one big full-fledged high-budget alien monster at the end. In keeping with Vishnevetsky's astute observation, Kitai's trials are not so overwhelming and numerous you lose track of them.

Smith Junior, Jaden, already starred -- with important help to be sure from Jackie Chan -- in a satisfactory (though itself lambasted as nepotistic) 2010 Karate Kid (http://www.cinescene.com/knipp/karatekid.htm")remake, so this is not his first starring role in a movie, and though just a tyke then, he "co-starred" with his father earlier in Muccino's quite good 2006 The Pursuit of Happyness. (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?1930-Gabriele-Muccino-Happyness%282006%29) Here he's taller, solider, but still a reedy kid, a mixture of cockiness and insecurity that is about what the story calls for. An aspect of After Earth that's problematic is the role of Will Smith, who downplays himself and underplays his role, and yet both in the story and the production is obviously the crucial element, giving the film a set of built-in contradictions. And his putatively Scientology-related message about fear and danger is intrusively motivational-lecture-y.

While some critics have spent all their spleen on Jaden and Will, others have virtually ignored them to concentrate on making mincemeat of the the director of tarnished reputation, appearing here as a hired gun. I can find nothing distinctive about his work this time except his choice of the designer above mentioned for the space ship, the gadgets, and the very un-rectilinear structures, like the ruined ship and the Raige family dwelling, all of which defy usual expectations. This is better looking and far less tedious than its predecessor, The Last Airbender. Sadly, Shyamalan may be best not doing his own stuff now.

After Earth opened in the US May 31, 2013.

Chris Knipp
06-07-2013, 09:13 AM
Despite the desire to denigrate Shyamalan, and denigrate Will Smith for having his young son co-star in a movie, if you have kids, especially young or early teen sons, they might really like AFTER EARTH, I think.

cinemabon
06-08-2013, 07:45 PM
You were awfully quick to point out what other critics felt from the start Chris. Was this to support the argument/critique that followed with more credence? Usually, one places such corroboration at the end of the piece. So you like it. I haven't seen it. However, your review has more positive to say about what other critics think, rather than how it should start with your premise; although you did say, "...fun and satisfying" (much the way a hot dog is?). Granted, you wish to make a statement early on you feel is justified. Perhaps the film is good. But, I am disqualified from commenting on the film, rather the body of your criticism.

I'm rather surprised you didn't go into Jaden's acting, rather you mentioned he had carried other roles. But specific to this role, nothing except "looking scared convincingly" hardly a resounding recommendation. The vast majority of complaints from the 40 odd reviews I read on Rotten Tomatoes (professional) and IMDB (disappointed sci -fi fans) centered on his weak performance. In this instance, I would blame the director and not the actor (if he had successfully acted well in other films). Some are calling on Jaden to attend acting school (a bit harsh). My suggestion would be for Shyamalan to re-examine his role as director. Perhaps he should stick to that from which he was inspired (and who also inspired DePalma) - Hitchcock. Not every director is good jumping genres. But again, not having seen it... I know, Chris. I know...

I'll see it on video and not before. "War" looks more interesting to me.

Chris Knipp
06-08-2013, 09:49 PM
http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/9373/69073000.jpg
BAD ACTOR? GOOD BODY SUIT.

I cite other reviews and film critics in my reviews all the time to set my remarks in a critical context and this was no different; ;I just happened to want to use them as the opener because there is so much bad press about the movie. I wanted to begin with a context for AFTER EARTH that was positive. I don't know about "more credence." Perhaps, yes. Why not? One wants to be believed. But I do not at any time say this is a great movie. On another website I rated it 5 1/2 out of 10 stars.

"...fun and satisfying" (much the way a hot dog is?). Sure, why not? Or much like a puppy is.

I did not find Jaden's performance "weak," neither do I think it harsh to call on him to attend acting school. "Looking scared convincingly" is a recommendation because it's all he has to do. It did not require River Phoenix. If pro tennis players and pro classical pianists can have coaches or teachers around, why not an actor? But to say Jaden's acting was so bad he should not be in a movie without taking acting lessons first, as they meant, is just a smear.

As I have said, "Sadly, Shyamalan may be best not doing his own stuff now." Hence I don't think it would help Shyamalan to "stick to" previous models, etc. Since Shyanmalan has gotten steadily worse with each successive movie, it is a good thing that this is NOT a Shyamalan movie. It's better as I said than THE LAST AIRBENDER. I saw that, and it was hard going. I couldn't write a review of it.

I wrote a review of SIGNS (http://www.chrisknipp.com/writing/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=77)way back in 2003. I believe that Shyamalan's movies were continually less successful, after the promise of the first one that was noticed, THE SIXTH SENSE. (I have not seen his first two before that.) This seems unusual. I didn't want to review anything after SIGNS because I didn't want to keep on repeating that. I think now maybe really he will be better if he goes on making movies for Jaden and Will Smith. This is of course not likely. Incidentally I found SIGNS highly derivative. At the same time I thought he was extravagantly talented, as shown in THE SIXTH SENSE and UNBREAKABLE. So it was sad to see him not getting anywhere. I think aspects of his mentality brought him down -- his infatuation with hokey mysticism, sci-fi, and fantasy, and inability to convey his interest in religion and spirituality through those topics.

I only maintain that AFTER EARTH could be a very entertaining movie for a boy of around nine to fifteen. Nothing more. But I think it fills that need in rather unique way.

But if you haven't seen THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES, or MUD, or WHAT MAISIE KNEW, or FRANCIS HA (I think showing in your area), better to go see them. Or if you want popcorn entertainment my recommendation is FAST & FURIOUS 6. Vin and Paul and Dwayne are waiting for you.

cinemabon
06-09-2013, 08:59 AM
I believe you said once recently that the early stuff we had written was lost. I remember how the old site used to look (format) and remember our obsession with Hitch/DePalma and other directors at the time I joined.

I, too, wrote a review of "Signs" but for the life of me, I cannot find it any longer. I believe I said it was the only Mel Gibson film I ever liked.

Not being a NASCAR fan or having anything to do with muscle cars other than growing up during that era, Fast and Furious would be the last movie I would see. My access to quality cinema in the land of "we gotta keep them gays outta Nawth Carolinah" is quite limited and frustrating to an old Chicago boy used to finding just about everything the New Yeu-orker's had/have. Therefore, my exposure to foreign and independent films has dropped to near nil. I'm very jealous of you and Oscar and Johann when you speak of certain filmmakers. I must satisfy my part with a few crumbs on the plate by reviewing mainstream films - a position I was relegated to as part of my move here.

My reading the reviews of others helps me decide (when I'm uncertain) how to spend my money and time on a film. If the vast majority believe (and in this case it was an overwhelming majority) the film has severe deficits, I don't bother. You've saved me many times. However, there are times when I want to see the film no matter what the crowd believes. In those instances, I either fight a lone battle or don't post (as you didn't for films that disappointed to the point of total failure; and I've had several of those, too).

I believe in debate. I believe in diversity of opinion. I value differences of judgement. I long for art-for-art's sake. And I miss the opportunity to enjoy those little statements of quality that small/independent/ and foreign films offer. However, most of all, I look forward to your reply, to Oscar's reply, to Johann's reply, to Tabuno's reply in the hope that I may be enriched by your input, which I value above all other criticisms.

Chris Knipp
06-09-2013, 10:28 AM
I should not have said "lost." It can be hard, maybe nearly impossible, to find old Flmleaf (then Filmwurld) posts but they are probably there somewhere in the Archive. There is one short thread from I found quickly about Mel Gibson in SIGNS here. (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?32-Living-Dead-vs-Signs) But it lacks your comments. There are a number of SIGNS-related threads. I notice in this one, our Administrator PMW, then more often a contributor, makes a comment on the problem of Gibson's presence.

If a taste for NASCAR races were necessary to enjoy the FAST AND FURIOUS series I would not watch it either. As for N.Carolina availbility,
I thought you lived in or near Raleigh. So that was why I just recommended THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES, MUD, FRANCES HA, and WHAT MAISIE KNEW, all good I think and showing there now according to Google Movies. I would go see the first two especially way before going to AFTER EARTH, unless you had a young boy in tow. MUD has two boys as main characters; the others would not be recommended for kids at all. Those four would reasonably qualify as small or independent films.

Of course we like debate. I also use reviews in deciding what to give priority to watching but rather than individual reviews, by checking the Metacritic ratings. But when there's controversy, or I smell prejudice -- Manohla's reviews of OBLIVION and AFTER EARTH smell strongly of that -- I am tempted to go regardless of press.. Despite Johann's prejudice against KARATE KID, I liked that well enough, and I liked the idea of another father-son outing for Will and Jaden, since Muccino's THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS was good. I recommend the Muccino, much more than AFTER EARTH.
.