PDA

View Full Version : THE FLAT (Arnon Goldfinger 2012)



Chris Knipp
11-04-2012, 11:17 PM
Arnon Goldfinger: THE FLAT (2012)

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640x480q90/910/mbRRRR.jpg
ARNON GOLDFINGER AND EDDA VON MILDENSTEIN IN THE FLAT

Scandal in a box

This personal investigation by Israeli documentary filmmaker Arnon Goldfinger starts with a discovery. As his recently deceased 98-year-old grandmother's Tel Aviv flat is being cleared out by family members, they come across a 1930's issue of a Nazi newspaper, Der Angriff, ("The Attack") that features an article called "A Nazi in Palestina," with a photo showing the author, Leopold von Mildenstein, was accompanied on this trip from Germany by Godlfinger's grandmother and grandfather, Gerda and Kurt Tuchler. Both von Mildenstein and the Tuchlers, it seems, were Zionists who favored stepping up Jewish emigration to Israel. The more surprising fact that emerges is that Gerda and Kurt, who lived 75 years in Israel deeply attached to their Germanness and in Gerda's case at least never properly learned to speak Hebrew, also in their very frequent travels (Kurt was a judge) revisited Germany and maintained the most cordial of relations with von Mildenstein and his wife right into the Fifties.

Like so many documentaries The Flat is being celebrated for its content when its accomplishment lags behind. It is an interesting depiction of post-WWII denial by both Germans with Nazi associations and by Jews with possible guilty secrets, but to describe Goldfinger's film trajectory as "research" goes a little far, and it proves very little beyond what the family discovered by riffling through Gerda's packrat document collection. Goldfinger is superficial and selective in what he finds and presents, and this film is being overpraised; reviews indicate that it misleads, judging from what the writers seem to have taken away from it. It's interesting to speculate what other richer information was passed over. The family is shown throwing out dozens of large garbage bags full of Gerda's treasures, and at the end the flat is stripped by odd jobbers for a few sheckels. A specialist in German books is seen dumping them into boxes with appalling pronouncements like "Goethe -- nobody reads him any more," and "Balzac -- nobody reads him any more." Even Shakespeare is dumped because in antiquated German script. "You don't know how many books they throw away in Germany now?" proclaims the expert. Goldfinger, satisfied with Der Angriff, a few letters, and the scandal he can raise by going to Germany and meeting von Mildenstein's daughter, some researchers, and some associates, isn't really that much different, perhaps, from his mother, who takes home from her mother's place only a few little ceramic figurines.

No doubt about the fact that von Mildenstein was a Nazi, a Nazi who was the Jews' friend, at least if he could help them move to Palestine, while the Jewish Affairs office was focused on that and not extermination. Goldfinger finds that von Mildenstein was a Nazi with the SS and received mention by Eichmann during his trial in Israel; von Mildenstein was Eichman's superior at an early Jewish Affairs Desk (1934-1937). But whether this is incriminating or exculpating remains unproven by the filmmaker, who prefers to dabble and suggest rather than to dig deep and establish.

No doubt that Goldfinger's mother Hannah, Gerda's daughter, knows nothing about this and wants to know nothing; and we see a lot of her frowning and pouting face as she's forced to contemplate possibilities she doesn't understand. Goldfinger's breakthrough is when he calls Edda, von Mildenstein's daughter, in Germany, and gets a friendly and welcoming response. Goldfinger is apparently over to Germany in a flash, and there's no doubt that Edda wants to know nothing either. After a visit by Goldfinger to a post-Unification records facility, he can present her with a CV in her father's own handwriting showing that he continued to work in the Third Reich after 1937 and right through the War, though in later years he did publicity for the Coca Cola Company. But as Dan Lieberman points out in a highly critical review of The Flat in Dissident Voice, (http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/10/the-film-the-flat-falls-flat/) Goldfinger doesn't prove anything. He succeeds in disturbing Edda, as he has disturbed Hannah, with the possibility that both their parents were up to no good. But Gerda and Kurt weren't Nazi collaborators so much as cultured Germans who liked living well and going back. And von Mildenstein may have just written travel books. (His last book, according to a Wikipedia article, was about cocktails.) What he did in Germany after 1937 is very hazy.

Another thing comes out though: Gerda's mother was shipped to Riga, Lativia, and killed by the Nazis. Did Gerda and Kurt just let this happen? Didn't anybody try to save her -- von Mildenstein, for instance, given the friendship? This is another thing that relatives didn't talk about, though a letter to Gerda from her mother in Riga turns up, reluctantly admitted as such by Hannah. But mostly as Lieberman points out, Goldfinger doesn't unearth any new information, despite his getting sidetracked into an effort to prove von Mildenstein to be a war criminal. He just films some people talking about what is provided in more detail if you do some Google searching and can read German. In 1980 Jacob Boas had published an article in History Today about von Mildenstein and Tuchler's visit to Palestine in 1933. It might have been more interesting to have a film exploring von Mildenstein's support of Zionism and its eventual rejection by the Nazis. It's a shame that a little sensationalism and a lot of closeups of your own and somebody else's family is enough to be credited with having made a brilliant and searching documentary. The Flat is a lot flatter and more insubstantial than it wants to admit. Documentaries are better off being methodical and detailed rather than confrontational and "thrilling." This isn't the good part of Michael Moore's influence (Moore was photographed with Goldfinger at Tribeca).

It was good that Goldfinger got his mother to travel to Germany, though. She speaks German, and if she goes over more often as she promises she may connect for the first time with a little more of her heritage that she seems to have labored lifelong in Israel to ignore.

The Flat, a longish 97min, in Hebrew, German and English, debuted at Jerusalem and has done well in Israel; it was featured at Tribeca. There is also a German-narrated version of it. It was released in the US October 29, 2012.

oscar jubis
08-31-2013, 11:24 PM
I watched The Flat today and I was riveted from beginning to end. I think Goldfinger discovers new information, in the form of Mildenstein's C.V., which you mention. I also think that Hanna and Mildenstein's daughter's reaction is more complex than saying they want to know nothing. There's some truth to that of course, but I think their responses are very ambiguous. If you look at the situation from the point of view of each woman, both elderly, you wonder what good would it do (to each woman as an individual) to find out of their parents' possibly reprehensible past. I was quite interested in the manner in which the filmmaker dealt with both women and their feelings about the past. Fascinating film.

Chris Knipp
09-01-2013, 12:15 AM
I think I went over the film in considerable detail and showed that it does not reveal the sensational new information it hints at doing, and I cite the article from Dissident Voice that explains this much more fully than I can in a review. If you look closely I don't simply say the two daughters want to know nothing, and you can call their reaction "very ambiguous" if you like. But "ambiguous" is still inconclusive, and hence negative. However Mildenstein's "CV" as you call it really is not new information. It's only new to Goldfinger. That doesn't make it an investigatory discovery for a documentary. It's even in Wikipedia. You end by suggesting that the two older women's desire to cover up their family's past, which they didn't know about, is quite understandable. Oh? Well, understandable is not admirable, and not necessary. Personally, no matter how elderly I might be, and I'm already very far from young, I would be quite eager to know of any wrongdoing, or simply profound contradictions, in my family's past. That would make my family more interesting. I want just the facts, man. You can certainly call this a "fascinating film" -- it's full of detail, certainly. Too bad that it does not have any truly deep revelations. I think you're falling for the surface glitter. There's ultimately no there, there.

Chris Knipp
09-01-2013, 12:21 AM
P.s. Don't get me wrong, this film is an interesting chapter in family history, and I'm glad you got a look at it.

I hope you read my new ONE DIRECTION review. You pointed out with justifiable pride in your thoroughness and loyalty that you read my Justin Bieber one, and these "boys" are more appealing than him by a good wide margin.

oscar jubis
09-01-2013, 01:01 AM
I read this recent review you're talking about. I thought that it was very honest in that you reveal you are a fan, having seen their videos and stuff. I don't think I could possibly review Free the Mind, the doc we talked about on another thread, without saying that my admiration is all about the subject or message of the film, not about any formal qualities. I really appreciate when critics acknowledge they have personal reasons that impact what one likes or does not like. Of course one tries to be objective as much as possible. And part of being objective is revealing one's biases. Anyway, it's such a rare thing that I should have posted my appreciation on that thread.

I will read the ancillary material you mention re: The Flat. And it's ok to disagree, as we do in this case, about the merits of the film. I will give more consideration to your criticisms but I have to be true to my experience of being consistently interested and curious about the material being presented and the persons involved in this story and the manner of presentation.

Chris Knipp
09-01-2013, 01:46 AM
Thanks about my ONE DIRECTION review. I of course offer more information about the band than Stephen Holden in his NY Times review because he has no particular interest or prior knowledge. Yes, one must mention such interest and knowledge for a review to be honest. I feel I went into more detail in my review than was strictly necessary or that would interest most viewers, but it may appeal to, or annoy, real fans of One Direction. Of course, I'd have derived enjoyment whether the 1D film was any good or not. It's not at all a bad film. However, had I had more detachment, I'd probably have emphasized more strongly, as other critics did (including Holden) -- mind you I did mention this -- Spurlock missed a real opportunity here of making a quirky, funny, satirical film. Louis, Niall, Liam, Zayn, and Harry would have been more than happy to take part.

In the case of THE FLAT, I think it requires considerable thought and research post-viewing to evaluate properly. Gut reactions are important, but that may apply differently for docs which are about fact than for features that work with fiction and emotion.

Chris Knipp
09-01-2013, 12:44 PM
Somewhat surprisingly AV Club, whose reviewers are young but not that by a long shake, not of an age to like a boy band, gives ONE DIRECTION: THIS IS US a B- rating, and their A.A. Dowd says (http://www.avclub.com/articles/one-direction-this-is-us,102220/) kind things about the group itself, not the music, but their niceness
This Is Us intersperses stereoscopic concert footage with lots and lots of scenes of the polite, barely pubescent lads horsing around, trying on clothes, and generally behaving like kids having the time of their young-adult lives. For uninitiated chaperones and good-sport dates, warming to the boys’ aw-shucks charisma will be considerably easier than falling for their sugary, disposable arena-pop. Dowd thinks Spurlock did a good job:
There’s no room here for the filmmaker’s usual front-and-center shtick: He doesn’t appear on camera at all, which automatically elevates This Is Us to the upper echelons of his oeuvre. Nothing if not deft at conveying loads of information in a colorful manner, Spurlock proves himself ideally suited to the gig And he even ends with a note of possibility that if they party with Bob Dylan they may discover the roots of longer careers.
Will earworm-catchy ditties like “What Makes You Beautiful” eventually give way to psychedelic greatness? Only time will tell, though the boys may have to stop living nice—and start partying with Bob Dylan—before they can get in touch with their own rubber souls.

Chris Knipp
09-01-2013, 01:13 PM
P.s. to Labor Day weekend 2013. I may see the reportedly almost totally pointless GETAWAY because at least I like cars and Ethan Hawke, but I need not re-watch Brian DePalma's remake PASSION, reviewed (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?3341-New-York-Film-Festival-2012&p=28468#post28468)as part of the NYFF last year. The source was a French film with a totally far-fetched screenplay, to begin with, and De Palma's is even emptier, more purely visual, lacking the catty energy of Ludivine Sagnier vs. Kristen Scott Thomas that Corneau delivered. Corneau went out without much of a flourish, just like Claude Miller, whose THERESE (the name cut down for non-francophone locals from Thérèse Desqueyroux) also an unimpressive career finale, opened in limited US release Aug. 23; I reviewed (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?3443-Rendez-Vous-with-French-Cinema-at-Lincoln-Center-2013&p=29665#post29665) as part of this year's Rendez-Vous with French Cinema. Preferable if you can find it would be Georges Frannju's 1962 version with Emmanuelle Riva, Philippe Noiret, Edith Scob and Sami Frey, which I saw when it was shown for comparison at Lincoln Center during this year's Rendez-Vous. Snappier and more distinctive.

I have seen Edgar Wright's THE WORLD'S END pub-crawl movie, but have not written a review. I'm only a fan of Wright's SHAUN OF THE DEAD, not so much of what's come since despite the high marks he's gotten. Wright has had a great ride with US critics with a 74 Metacritic career average thus far.

oscar jubis
09-02-2013, 01:50 AM
Thanks for the link to the informative piece by Lieberman. He makes a number of valid criticisms from the assumption that theatrical documentary films are first and foremost reportage, a means to communicate new information. Since I knew nothing about Mildenstein, everything the film says about him is news to me but not to someone well versed on the subject like the essayist. So I can agree with (a lot in) this essay and still argue that the film works quite well as a Movie, as drama, and had a lot to teach someone with poor knowledge of the subject like me.

Chris Knipp
09-02-2013, 06:00 PM
You're welcome. Glad the link was useful to you.

oscar jubis
09-03-2013, 12:01 AM
I must admit I think less of the picture than I did before reading your review (and link). If one's opinion and "take" of a movie is fixed, what's the point of reading reviews?

Chris Knipp
09-03-2013, 12:45 AM
Exactly. Sometimes, in this kind of case especially, reviews can be written by people who know more about the subject, and their knowledge can alter how one understands the subject and the film.

oscar jubis
09-03-2013, 06:09 PM
I am always interested in what Brian de Palma and Claude Miller are doing, even if their latest efforts are not great, or not even very good, as you point out. We showed Therese during our Rendezvous with French Cinema at beginning of the year and I missed it. We will show it again in a couple of weeks. I'll catch it then. The film I am watching soon that I am most excited about is THE ACT OF KILLING. Have you reviewed it?

Chris Knipp
09-03-2013, 06:48 PM
Yes, my ACT OF KILLING review is in the ND/NF section for this year. As THÉRÈSE DESQUEROUX (as it was then still known) was in the R-V around the same time. PASSION was actually shown in the NYFF last year, so my review of that is there -- all in Filmleaf Festival Coverage. I hope you get to see Georges Franju's 1963 version of THÉRÈSE. It was excellent to be able to see it at the same time at Lincoln Center at a special evening screening for the public, which I attended. They make a very interesting comparison. PASSION is fabulous eye candy. Unfortunately not much else, and even the pretty dumb Alain Corneau original has a bit more to it, especially the first half.

oscar jubis
09-04-2013, 08:09 PM
Thanks. I'll try to watch the films before reading your reviews. Trying to decide whether to attend a free theatrical screening of The Great Gatsby tonight, or re-watch Mon Oncle D'Amerique for dissertation purposes.