PDA

View Full Version : Of Gods and Men



Howard Schumann
03-14-2011, 11:21 PM
OF GODS AND MEN (Des homes et des dieux)

Directed by Xavier Beauvois, France, (2010), 122 minutes

As Vivekananda has said, “The intensest love that humanity has ever known has come from religion, and the most diabolical hatred that humanity has known has come from religion.” Both of these elements are present in Xavier Beauvois Of Gods and Men, the story of seven Roman Catholic French Trappist monks kidnapped by radical Islamists from their monastery in the village of Tibhirine in Algeria during the 1990s Algerian Civil War. The film depicts the sacrifices people of good will in both religions are willing to make for each other, and that the separation between religions is not an unbridgeable gap.

Winner of the Grand Prix at the 2010 Cannes Film Festival, Of Gods and Men stars Lambert Wilson as Christian, Prior of the monks, and 79-year-old Michael Lonsdale as a world weary medic who treats up to 150 Moslem villagers each day. The film derives its title from the Book of Psalms, Psalm 81:6-7 quoted at the beginning of the film: "I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes." Filmed in Morocco, the film shows the daily life of the Trappist monks before the terrorist threat becomes real.

Though a large part of their day consists of contemplation and devotion, living in close contact with the Muslim population allows them to interact with them in a positive way, healing the sick, selling honey in the nearby markets, and caring for the aged. In addition, daily chores such as cooking, gardening, loading wood for the fireplace, and cleaning take up a large part of the day. Soon word gets around about the murder of European workers on a construction site by the terrorists and the monks recoil in horror when they learn about the stabbing of a woman riding on a bus by Islamic fundamentalists simply because she was not wearing a veil.

The Algerian government asks the monks to leave for their own safety but Christian tells them that their calling is to serve the people of the community and he insists on remaining, though he is willing to let the other monks decide. The issue becomes suddenly more immediate when a group of fundamentalists show up at the monastery on Christmas Eve demanding medicine for their wounded colleagues. Though the request is refused, Christian quotes the Koran to their spokesman Ali Fayattia (Farid Larbi) and they end up shaking hands, though the Prior senses rightly that they will be back.

When all agree that they will not abandon the monastery even at the risk of death, the dramatic high point of the film is reached when the monks recreate the Last Supper by sitting around a small table drinking wine and listening to a recording of Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake ballet. As the camera pans from face to face, we can observe a beatific smile on some faces and tears on others, demonstrating an inner poetry and reverence for life. The monks are not Christian moralists but spiritualists confronting the extremes of the human condition, characters who point the way to overcoming despair.

The monks, like the Curé de Torcy in Bernanos’ Diary of a Country Priest, " love poverty with a deep, reasoned, lucid love as equal loves equal," expressing the eternal struggle of the spirit to know Christ and to come to terms with his anguish. The heroes of the film are not saints. They are flesh and blood human beings, full of ambiguity and fear, but never far from compassion and humility, willing to offer us the possibility of a world transformed by grace.

GRADE: A-

See Chris Knipp's review here (http://www.filmleaf.net/showthread.php?2875-New-York-Film-Festival-2010&p=25121#post25121)

Chris Knipp
03-15-2011, 08:02 AM
I agree with your positive assessment, as my review which you link to shows. This is a widely acclaimed film, and recently won the César for best French film of the year and had 11 César nominations. Winner of the Best Foreign Language Film award from the National Board of Review. I saw it as part of the New York Film Festival, so my review is in the Festival Coverage section of Filmleaf for NYFF 2010. It went into US limited theatrical release in Landmark theaters February 25, 2011 and is now at eight theaters across the country. I admired greatly Beauvois' previous film [I]Le Petit LieutenantI] (2005), which others paid little attention to here, though it was given awards in France.

Howard Schumann
03-15-2011, 10:20 AM
I agree with your positive assessment, as my review which you link to shows. This is a widely acclaimed film, and recently won the César for best French film of the year and had 11 César nominations. Winner of the Best Foreign Language Film award from the National Board of Review. I saw it as part of the New York Film Festival, so my review is in the Festival Coverage section of Filmleaf for NYFF 2010. It went into US limited theatrical release in Landmark theaters February 25, 2011 and is now at eight theaters across the country. I admired greatly Beauvois' previous film [I]Le Petit LieutenantI] (2005), which others paid little attention to here, though it was given awards in France.

Congratulations on your review being so widely recognized. It is quite good. By the way, you didn't link to my review of Incendies. Was that an oversight?

Chris Knipp
03-15-2011, 10:29 AM
I see no indication that my review is "widely recognized," but I did link to yours of Incendies already: look again.

Howard Schumann
03-15-2011, 11:05 AM
I see no indication that my review is "widely recognized," but I did link to yours of Incendies already: look again.

Oh, sorry. I was in a hurry and misread your post. Anyway, it deserves to be widely recognized. Thanks for the link to Incendies. I didn't see it the first time I looked.

Chris Knipp
03-15-2011, 09:06 PM
That's okay.

oscar jubis
05-22-2011, 06:52 PM
I enjoyed reading your reviews, guys.Thanks. A good film and yet, I find myself trying to put into words precisely why I like it less than the Cannes award and critical consensus indicate. Maybe the fact that only two characterizations are sufficiently developed: the monks played by Michael Lonsdale and Lambert Wilson (a Resnais regular). Maybe that the film pays no mind to the colonial aspect of the monks' presence (the actual Christian was a soldier during the Argelian War of Independence). Maybe the film just didn't ultimately give me enough to think about... just maybe. Glad I saw it, I mean it, but not enough there to intrigue me, or delight me, or challenge me like a great movie should.

Chris Knipp
05-23-2011, 01:32 AM
I can sympathize with your response, though I don't entirely share it. This is not one of my favorite movies. It may be that we are both out of sympathy for the sympathy shown for these Christian monks planted in a Muslim country during a time of conflict and refusing to get out of the way. Why is that so noble of them? However I think the film has more depth than your remarks give it credit for, and the couple of rounded characters are rich enough to make up for lack of detail in the others.