PDA

View Full Version : BURLESQUE (Steve Antin 2010)



Chris Knipp
11-28-2010, 06:46 PM
Steve Antin: Burlesque (2010)
Review by Chris Knipp

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/1939/burlesquef.jpg
CHER AND CHRISTINA AGUILERA IN BURLESQUE

Iowa girl makes good

Remember that famous 1920's advertising tag line for mail-order music lessons? "They Laughed When I Sat Down at the Piano. But When I Started to Play!"

That's more or less the premise of this slick, entertaining, but generic little movie musical starring Cher, Christina Aguilera, Cam Gigandet and Stanley Tucci. Small-town girl Ali (Aguilera), an orphan since the age of seven, runs away from Iowa to Hollywood bent on becoming a singer and dancer. She winds up immediately at the Burlesque Club, a show bar run by Tess (Cher) threatened with bank repossession. The super-eager Ali wangles a job as cocktail waitress by getting friendly with bartender Jack (Gigandet). Tess laughs at Ali when she offers to try out as a dancer -- but oh, when she starts to dance! Tess and her stage manager Sean (Tucci) are instantly mesmerized. Later when another jealous performer pulls the plug on the music -- usually the dancers lip-sync to famous records -- Ali belts out a song, without even needing a mike. Oh boy! She's so good, Tess immediately decides to build a whole new show around her.

And that's about it. There are the other girls who don't like Ali at first, especially the drunken Nikki (Kristen Bell). And there's the on-and-off relationship with Jack, whom Ali moves in with when her room is burglarized, assuming (mistakenly, it seems) that Jack is gay. The minimal plot is mainly an excuse to string together a series of glitzy, artificial song-and-dance numbers, most of them featuring Aguilera, whose dancing is fast and slick, and whose singing features a forced, husky soulfulness.

In stories as simplistic as this the line between good and evil tends to be clearly drawn. You'd expect the bad folks to be the jealous girls who resent Ali's talent, and Marcus, the real estate magnate who wants to take over the club and build a high-rise in its place. But the girls never seem that jealous, and Marcus is played by Eric Dane, an actor much too young and pleasant to be either a real estate magnate or a bad guy. He's always nice to Ali even though Tess doesn't "like" him. The affable charm of Burlesque, if you can take it that way, is that it has no teeth. You quickly pick up that nothing bad is ever going to happen -- to anybody in the movie. Ali may have had a rough life in Iowa, but things sure go easily for her in Hollywood. Tess puts on a show of being unimpressed by her at first, but there's never any doubt she'll become a star -- and fast.

The movie/musical comes to an end when the club's debt problems are happily resolved and Ali finds the right man, who turns out to have been Jack all along. She was wooed by Marcus, and it's hard to resist a man who has everything when you're a girl with nothing, but Ali realizes Marcus may not be a bad guy, but he's the wrong guy (That's exactly how she puts it, emphasizing the movie's insistence that nobody is really bad.) Unfortunately Jack doesn't really seem quite the right guy, either. Even at the end it's hard to believe he's not gay, or at least bi. Steve Antin, the writer as well as the director, who's openly gay, has made the movie so gay-friendly full-on heterosexuality seems to be out of place in it. The sexuality, despite all the tits and hip-wiggling, is vague -- except that Sean is definitely gay. Tucci is reduced to playing a cruder, less interesting version of the boy-Friday role he played opposite Meryl Streep in The Devil Plays Prada. When Jack's fiancee finally shows up from New York she looks like a girl hired from the club to play the part as a cover for a boyfriend. Maybe Ali should just forget about finding a guy and focus on her career. Maybe Ali herself is gay. The way she eyes her former enemy Nikki in the dressing room at the end, it looks like an affair may be brewing.

As for Cher, whose beauty blends drag queen mannerism with vampire pallor, her immobility contrasts with the manic Bob Fosse-knockoff dancing of her troupe of girls -- and a pointlessly jittery lens that swings back and forth as if the cinematographer were fanning himself with the camera. She utters a few languid lines and delivers a couple of songs in a rich, soulful, husky voice, not moving much. She reveals no wrinkles, of course; maybe she has to remain still to keep them from showing. As Tess, Cher projects a mixture of world-weariness, dedication and good nature that is all Antin requires of her. It's only a minor weakness he has cast as Ali's virtual older sister a lady who specializes in looking ageless. Cher epitomizes the total artificiality of this movie that is its weird charm. If you don't accept that, you will not have a good time.

Needless to say, Ali's magical ability to perform complicated dance numbers just from watching them at the bar and belt out songs without any particular training or experience are matters best not delved into. This is the magical world of theater, with hardly a nod to the everyday world. Every set looks just like that -- a set, including the places where people live. This whole movie could be transferred directly to the stage with nothing lost -- and nothing gained, except the legitimacy conferred when songs are performed live, so you can tell a real person is singing them.

This lack of realism extends particularly to the thing called "burlesque," which in the real world, whether the old-school kind with g-strings, pasties and vaudeville clowns or a hard-bodied and aggressive neo-burlesque, involves a bracing degree of sleaze totally lacking in this airbrushed, thoroughly rehearsed and over-edited version. A dash of more rank flavor, though strictly of stage pedigree, comes from Alan Cumming as the club's gatekeeper, winking at the camera in a series of quick cameos to evoke the louche Thirties Berlin of Cabaret. But 99% of the time this is the synthetic new world of American movie musicals of the slickest kind, like Rob Marshall's Chicago. Yet Burlesque lacks the clear-cut distinctions between songs and segments you get in Chicago, as well as the so-bad-it's-good campiness of Verhoeven's Showgirls. If Burlesque becomes a Guilty Pleasure, it will be one of a very bland kind.

Steve Antin's Burlesque creates its own Brigadoon, a land of enchantment to which no real harm can ever come, where no one ever ages: they just have endless face-jobs. (Peter Gallagher, who plays Tess' almost forgotten ex-husband and co-owner Vince, seems to have acquired a few wrinkles, but we don't see much of him.) The absence of the slightest worry about the fate of the characters, because it's so obvious no one is even going to stub a toe, makes the song-and-dance numbers all the more enjoyable as pure performance. But a movie that has no credible darkness on its horizon, no sense of the world's obstacles, also arouses too little emotion to leave a strong memory.

tabuno
11-29-2010, 12:29 AM
There are some amazing musical productions in this small, compact movie that captures some of the dazzle of best Oscar Picture CHICAGO (2002), particularly one of the earlier numbers using a similar flashy Richard Gere court revue. This is a more soft touch THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA (2006) as Christina Aquilera appears to get to escape the wrath of a devil and contend more with a softer version of Meryl Streep. The music itself doesn't quite have the poignancy and magic of MOULIN ROUGE (2001), the universal mass popularity of MAMMA MIA! (2008), and the haunting, ethereal sounds from THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA. This overly predictable musical, however extends itself in some great editing interspersing musical production numbers with movie scenes moving the storyline along and spends time on character plot development in a more convoluted path. The biggest weakness and one that makes its distractive presence noticeable is a technical one - the lip sinking. Even the first musical number is so disconnected between the acting and the singing that continues throughout much of the movie undercuts one of the crucial points of how BURLESQUE becomes more popular. There is also a weak scene in acting between Cher and Chirstina when the owner offers advice to her up and coming employee. The ending doesn't quite have the nice edgy feel of THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA and has a much more mass audience feels go ending and excludes that movies the dramatic collision with good and narcissism. Nevertheless, the energy, and entertainment value has bravado and power and compelling attraction.

Chris Knipp
11-29-2010, 12:38 AM
This overly predictable musical, however extends itself in some great editing interspersing musical production numbers with movie scenes moving the storyline along and spends time on character plot development in a more convoluted path. I don't think it's such a good thing, actually. I find it confusing, and think it undercuts the musical numbers to do that. It seems gimmicky to me. I agree of most of what you say otherwise, though.

I agree with you on the lip syncing. And beyond that, the sound and the action in the performance sequences just doesn't seem to relate. You have no sense that the voices are coming out of the mouths of a specific person.

I found the whole thing enjoyable too, just not that memorable, and too unrealistic. I don't know quite why you compare it with THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA. That seems so much better, and it's not a musical.

tabuno
11-29-2010, 12:52 AM
Some how I liked this fusion of dance numbers with cuts to the movie plot because the movie was both a musical and yet it also was a drama and in that way, it wasn't exclusively to be a pure musical. While it was confusing, it isn't much different from when there are flash backs or other cuts into musical elements used in other movies...the musical productions actually became both background and foreground of the events occurring in the movie. Unlike CHICAGO, the movie was not as fantasy-based as a musical and therefore its reliance on pure uninterrupted dance, musical numbers wasn't a necessary element of the movie. The softening of the good and bad stereotypes, unlike that found in DEVIL WEARS PRADA was both a weakness and a strength. While the "bad" guy element was eliminated, the movie actually represented the more authentic drama genre of a movie rather than the musical genre of a movie. The movie was made more believable at the sacrifice of a dramatic sensationalism of CHICAGO and MOULIN ROUGE. Unlike CHORUS LINE (the original stage production was much better), the musical numbers weren't has powerful or memorable and for that reason undercut the potency of the movie.

Chris Knipp
11-29-2010, 01:56 AM
It's true, there are important actors in the movie who do not sing or dance: Stanley Tucci, Peter Gallagher, Cam Gigandet, and Eric Dane. I don't know if that is unique. But it's not a "musical" in the sense that everybody sings their story. The relationship between the songs and the story were variable. I will grant you that the musical part and all the visuals are pretty, but the lack of real conflict and the ease of Ali's progress toward succes make the story weak.

tabuno
11-29-2010, 03:57 PM
I recently saw MORNING GLORY and when I compare the anticipatory dramatic conflict with BURLESQUE, I felt that BURLESQUE didn't have as deeply as powerful or sustained feeling of unpredictable tension that I experienced in DEVIL WEARS PRADA or even MORNING GLORY that went through serveral gyrations of upward and downward movement, in ways similar to the sustained physical active tension in INCEPTION and in which MORNING GLORY sustained its momentum through plot development and near crises of what could be expected in the real world when one gets in such positions as Rachel McAdams's character obtained.

Chris Knipp
11-29-2010, 05:22 PM
I am often surprised by your choice of films to compare with each other. Unfortunatly I haven't seen Morning Glorry so I can't comment. I read the book afterward of THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA. It is not a good book. But they made a very good movie out of it. Not a great one, but Streep gives a splendid performance. It's nice to see her as somebody who's anything but cuddly. The origin of her character the Vogue editor Anna Wintour is so cold she was nicknamed "Nuclear Wintour." Streep has a lot of fun with that role.

I hope to see ALL GOOD THINGS tomorrow, a previw, with Ryan Gosling. It looks interesting.

tabuno
12-14-2010, 09:35 PM
While I didn't read THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA novel, I did read the original source novel of BLADERUNNER that was written by Phillip K. Dick and I remain puzzled was to why people who've read the book think it's as good as they say it is. BLADERUNNER, the movie remains a classic, but the sci fi novel, not as much so and which for the most part appears to be the reversal of the appraisal of such adapted movies.