PDA

View Full Version : FUNNY PEOPLE (Judd Apatow 2009)



Chris Knipp
08-03-2009, 07:17 AM
Judd Apatow: FUNNY PEOPLE (2009)

Review by Chris Knipp

Not so funny, not so deep

Funny People is only the third movie Judd Apatow has actually directed, but he has acquired a vast sweep in the world of entertainment as a promoter and producer of comedy. He’s had a hand in so many laugh projects, formally attaching his name to another feature seems fraught with significance. This time he focuses on the people he knows best – comics. And this movie has a wealth of material, some of it in theory deeply personal. But while sacrificing the hilarity he achieved in 40 Year Old Virgin and Knocked up, or achieved vicariously through the comedy TV series and films he’s fostered or organized, Apatow doesn’t ultimately compensate by achieving profundity in Funny People. While the trailers hinted that there might be something ground-breaking here, the whole movie turns out to have been a misstep.

Lying behind this new project is the old cliche' that people who are funny for a living are sad inside, that "funny people" aren't funny. The picture of current comedy the movie provides us with, with its excess of penis jokes and lack of either wit or good topical commentary, is a dim one. Worse yet, Funny People is poorly constructed -- meandering and too long, with a last segment that belongs in another movie, or better, on the cutting room floor. Funny People is still a must-see for students of contemporary American comedy as everything associated with Apatow is, but it’s a disappointment, and even a bit of a chore to watch.

The screenplay makes darn sure its chief clown will be sad inside -- and outside too. George Simmons (Adam Sandler, once Apatow’s real life roommate), who’s gotten rich and famous not off wit but witlessness -- high concept Eddie Murphy-style comedies – gets told he has leukemia. But he’s a deeply sad man anyway, cold and friendless, hanging out only with celebrities and fans, living in a mansion full of useless swag. Trying to return to standup, he does a routine that’s nothing but self-pity. Young hopeful Ira Wright (Seth Rogen) follows him at the mike and mocks that. This gets George’s attention and he hires Ira as his joke writer, gofer, and nursemaid.

Ira has two roommates, also Hollywood hopefuls. One, Mark Taylor Jackson (Jason Schwartzman), is an actor who preens himself on his lead role as a teacher in a mediocre TV series. The other is a glib fat boy called Leo (Jonah Hill) who tells Ira his recent weight loss undermines his comic potential. Apatow looks about to have some fun with the joke-trading and in-fighting between Ira and his roomies, but this is a disappointment, as is all the joking. There are too few jokes at home, the snippits at the club are too brief, and there’s never anything really hilarious. Some reviews suggest Ira, Leo, and Schwartzman trade witty vicious improvised barbs. Of course there's some improvising, but that's not remotely true.

George’s brooding leads him to some unconvincing mending of bridges, shown in an irrelevant montage. Did it take leukemia for him to realize he’s been lonely? Anyway, he decides to drag Ira up to Marin County and visit his former best girl, Laura, whom he cheated on and lost. She's played by Apatow’s wife, Leslie Mann, a lightweight actress, whose kids play her kids. George pointlessly injects himself between Laura and her husband of twelve years, Eric Bana (allowed to use, and mocked for, his real Australian accent). This whole section takes the Funny People away from what little it had going for it, into the realm of a wanabe Nora Efron movie.

Some critics have given Apatow a high pass for this effort as “sprawling” because it’s “deeply personal.” Some have even said Adam Sandler proves an interesting straight actor as he was in Paul Thomas Anderson’s Punch Drunk Love. Greatly exaggerated claims for a film that is basically a disaster. The main character in such a context hardly acquires a life of his own. Sandler has a strong presence yet is a non-person, a cold bloke. He’s no Gloria Swanson, just a warning against becoming famous. His George Simmons, like most of the Apatow characters, is an adolescent who’s gotten rich and fat instead of growing up. The real story might be how close these details are to the actors own experience, but the movie isn't brave or bold enough to take thaty on.

Funny People gets its only warmth from Seth Rogen, who has become more visible since his last Apatow-directed movie, Knocked Up. He’s the one who makes having Sandler on the screen bearable. He’s been an amiable straight man ever since “Freaks and Geeks” and “Undeclared,” Apatow’s two TV series, which still remain his most engaging efforts. (Maybe the restrictions on language of mainstream TV aren’t such a bad idea.) Rogen was a great foil for James Franco in Pineapple Express. If some of his other projects are less successful, he at least deserves credit for breaking out on his own. But Rogen, alas, is also one of the main contributors to the movie’s wretched excess of unfunny penis jokes, though one routine he does at the comedy club is the film’s most extended and amusing such moment – as well as, significantly, an avoidance of profanity. Those below-the-belt cracks get laughs the way boys at school get them by talking dirty when the teacher is out of the room. We can do better, and so should Judd Apatow.

oscar jubis
08-03-2009, 05:10 PM
I've been riding the Apatow train and here's where I get off. In retrospect, his greatest accomplishment was discovering Seth Rogen and allowing him to improvise most of Knocked Up. There's a piece on Apatow in the latest issue of Time magazine which includes this quote: "We had a debate over how much is too much for a comedian to talk about his penis and testicles. No amount is too much for an audience."
Clearly, I don't belong to the audience for these movies. I didn't like this type of juvenile humor when I was a juvenile. So why would I sit through it now! It's not like Apatow's stuff is truly in bad taste, meant to truly provoke an audience, expose hidden and not-so-hidden prejudices, and make even us liberals feel a bit uncomfortable sometimes. In other words, I'd much rather watch Sasha Baron Cohen or early John Waters .

Chris Knipp
08-04-2009, 09:52 AM
Seth Rogen has contributed to a lot of Apatow factory productions, notably as a credited writer for "Undeclared," Superbad (rather than Knocked Up), Drillbit Taylor, and Pineapple Express. Improvisation plays a part in all these productions too. And various "Freaks and Geeks" people such as Jason Segal have contributed to the writing. It turns out Seth Rogen also wrote six episodes of "Da Ali G Show," so you can't separate him from Sash Baren Cohen.

In the quote from Time, I believe Judd is referring to stand-up audiences. However, the transition from stand-up to a movie goes awkwardly in Funny People and I do not defend the movie or argue that you or anyone would enjoy it. I think it's a flop, though not one that I as a student of the Apatow phenomenon would be able to avoid seeing. I don't know how you can get off the Apatow train. It's running on a lot of tracks at once.

I"m with you on the objection to the juvenile, though I prefer Superbad to Knocked Up, with the latter's dubious wish fulfillment elements.

oscar jubis
08-04-2009, 07:22 PM
With all due respect to Apatow fans, I haven't found anything he's been associated with to be as funny as the first half of Kevin Smith's Chasing Amy or as devastatingly sad as the second half of that film. Perhaps I have more of an East Coast (and Catholic) sensibility and I find Apatow's El Lay stuff a bit difficult to relate. But perhaps Smith is simply more talented.

Chris Knipp
08-04-2009, 07:53 PM
I'm not personally an Apatow fan,just a follower of the pop phenomenon. Kevin Smith may be smarter or whatever, and I'm east coast too. Still the Apatow influence is great. Have you seen "Freaks and Geeks" and "Undeclared"? I think those show the positive roots of the stuff. Maybe it all works better as a TV series than as feature films, especially when he gets serious and ambitious like in FUNNY PEOPLE and the structure loses its tidiness.

My recent reviews are a bit patchy, due to extra pressures in my life in NYC this week. I hope to expand and polish them and add one or two more.

oscar jubis
08-05-2009, 08:25 AM
I know you are originally from Baltimore and spend a lot of time in New York (and in Europe too). I also didn't mean to include you among Apatow fans. I generally feel that, like Woody Allen, Apatow has now become more famous than he deserves based on his moderate talents. I watched a couple of episodes of Freaks and Geeks a while back and recognize it was a good series. I also notice that a few critics, yourself not included, really like Funny People, which I have not seen. After reading your review and one other, I decided this is the first Apatow movie to skip. Then I noticed the film is...almost 2 and 1/2 hours long!!! Then I found out the budget was....$75 million dollars!!! This is simply obscene. Even if I were to watch it and like it, I am rooting against it at the box office. It seems exemplary of what is wrong with Hollywood.
I am more inclined towards the Jersey-based, independent spirit of Kevin Smith (et.al.). I am not elevating him into the realm of genius but I personally like is magnus opus a lot more than anything Apatow has ever touched.
I admire your energy and perseverance in writing so many long reviews. I think it is safe to speak on behalf of everyone here and express our appreciation.

Chris Knipp
08-05-2009, 05:19 PM
Yes, FUNNY PEOPLE is too long. He lost it. Did not know thay blew $75 million on it. That's ridiculous It doesn't show. Bear in mind that when you say "Apatow movie," that is a loose category. Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story are Apatow movies, and so are some that he didn't write or produce but his close pals created. The "Freaks and Geeks" people were the core from which it grew. I also recommend the sort of sequel, "Undeclared," which is about beginning college students. It even has an appearance by Adam Sandler. A nice variation is the presence of Charlie Hunnam, as the seductive Brit theater student, who adds another facet of suavity and charm. I don't think they liked him much. He's too good-looking, and not one bit chubby. Joel Segal said that when they were all assembled for a big seminar-commemoration of "Undeclared." He was not asked back. Seth is there. So is Joel Segal. And they do keep coming back.

It's wroth noting that both "Freaks and Geesk" and "Undeclared" were quickly dropped by the TV producers and Apatow saw himself as something of a orn loser. This may partly explain how he has spread his empire and taken every opportunity he can get since. And perhaps gone for cheap dirty laughs and given up the goal of quality and authenticity that he sought and achieved in "Freaks and Geeks" and "Undeclared."

Smith is more of an "auteur" but his movies are uneven. He did not spawn a whole school of comedy fish like Apatow. Can you see Jason Mewes making a movie on his own? But as I think I pointed out before, there is more cross-over than you are acknowledging: Seth stars in Zack and Miri Make a Porno. And Justin Long is in that, Drag Me to Hell, and FUNNY PEOPLE.

I also went to college in New England and lived a year in NYC when I graduated. I have lived in California for longer than I dare mention, but I was 30, and fully formed, when I got here and always think of myself as an East Coast person and am out of key with the laid-back it's-all-good vibe affected here. However, I do enjoy the fact that I just got back home to a sunny day in teh Bay Area with the temperature 61º, while NYC is 88º and muggy today. I had amazingly nice temperatures in NYC though for my two weeks there. It had been an unusually cool spring and summer, there was a lot of rain, and it was way nicer than you'd ever dare to expect for July and August.

tabuno
02-13-2010, 09:06 PM
FUNNY PEOPLE (2009), finally and belatedly viewed using Netflix, presents in one long portrayal something not often seen in this industry - authentic dramatization that carefully crafts a geniune story with all the raw, conflicted, bitter disgust of reality along with some of the beautiful tenderness and honest emotional outpouring of thoughts and emotions that resonate in a way that LOST IN TRANSLATION (2003), THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT (1999), and THE BRIDGES OF MADISON COUNTY (1995) captured in their own special and unique ways. Amazingly this story goes further than these movies and offers the audience a behind the scenes look at some of those experiences in the foul-mouth stand-up industry of comedy and goes even further by exposing not just the special look of stand-up but a even deeper examination of relational contradictions and bondedness that exists in real life. The storyline feels real and avoids the typical stereotypical predictable outcomes along the path to a remarkably satisfying conclusion. Easily one of the best movies released in 2009.