PDA

View Full Version : AWAY WE GO (Sam Mendes 2009)



Chris Knipp
06-24-2009, 02:13 AM
Sam Mendes: AWAY WE GO (2009)

Needed: synonyms for "twee"

Review by Chris Knipp

This third and least successful screen attempt by Sam Mendes to show us what America is like comes from a screenplay written by Dave Eggers and his wife, Vendela Vida. This is a road trip involving a thirty-something couple, Burt Farlander (John Krasinski) and Verona de Tessant (Maya Rudolph). Verona is six months pregnant. Verona's parents are dead. Burt's (Catherine O'Hara, Jeff Daniels) whom they've moved to Denver to be near, announce that they are going to live in Antwerp, Belgium for two years, starting just before the baby will be born. They go out in search of family or support visiting siblings, college friends, former coworkers, thinking of finding a place where they can live with their new baby and have some human warmth nearby.

We know how these American road trips go, from David O. Russell's to Payne Anderson's. They're tours of absurdity, examinations of questionable lifestyles. This time the attention is on aberrations in child-rearing. The couple winds up settling near no one, taking, it appears, an empty, dilapidated house in a southern mansion style in an unspecified place (Florida, perhaps, or Louisiana?), which opens up front and back to let the light and air through and looks out on a body of water. They have three months to get it ready. They decide it's "perfect." Despite going through the motions of self-questioning, they are exceedingly pleased with themselves and their prolonged immaturity. They know they're not losers. Everybody else is.

Some of the families Burt and Verona visit are unpleasant, and the others are unhappy. All are drawn with a very heavy hand. This works for some of the actors. Alison Janney is effective as the boorish wife of a drunken husband, a mother who talks crudely and abusively of her own two children right in front of them, demonstrating that to the kids, her words are just "white noise.' The airport arrival tells it all. She goes on about how fat Verona is, and her husband (Jim Gaffigan) takes the gift wine out of Burt's paper bag and goes to look for an opener. Maggie Gyllenhaal is impressive as "LN," an insufferable woman (but they're all insufferable!) with lots of money who shares creepy ideas about family togetherness and sex with her husband (Josh Hamilton). Despite the caricature, Gyllenhaal is creepily subtle.

It's hard to look forward to the next visit as Burt and Verona go from Denver to Phoenix to Tucson to Madison to Montreal to Florida, and none of the places are distinguished from each other except by temperature. One airport turns the couple away on suspicion that Verona is eight months pregnant rather than six, and they take the train. They have a succession of rental cars and everywhere they go they are plied with liquor.

If things could possibly go any more downhill that comes in Montreal, where Burt and Verona love the family they visit, who have six adopted children, till they go to amateur night at a bar that has pole dancing and the husband (Chris Messina) reveals that his wife (Melanie Lynskey) just had one of many miscarriages and that they are both miserable.

Earlier in an airport a lady comes up with a boy she is obtrusively instructing, and then she asks him a question and he recites a little speech full of horrible menace -- something about trying to smother his sister. Does this mean parents who push their kids too hard to learn stuff will create monsters? What kind of nonsense is that?

Throughout the screenplay is a weird combination of keen observation -- it does give some sense of capturing the repetitious and bland rhythms of middle-class thirty-something speech patterns -- and completely artificial, mean, doctrinaire caricature. In Russell's Flirting with Disaster there was a search for parents in which the satirical encounters were hilarious and unexpected. In Alexander Payne's Sideways (let's skip over About Schmidt; the less said the better), the incidents are genuine revelations of character. We don't really learn anything about Burt and Verona. I'm not even convinced that they do what they say to make money. Her parents are dead (a reflection of Eggers' own early loss of parents?) and his are self-centered and soon to be absent. The others we'd rather not know about. When they go to see Burt's brother in Florida (Paul Schneider) it's because his wife has left him, and he is simply incapable of making the best of it. Another example of how marriage and child-rearing can go wrong.

At the heart of the story are, of course, Burt and Verona, and there's no there there. The actors are pleasant enough, but what their characters have to say to each other, with all its self-absorption and unendurable cuteness, should have stayed with them. To talk about this movie you need to get a thesaurus and look up synonyms for "twee." The "emo" music is sweet and obtrusive, treacle on top of the icing.

oscar jubis
06-28-2009, 01:54 PM
The 8.0 IMdb users score is indicative that audiences are enjoying this film quite a bit. The score puts it among the best received films of the year to date. On the other hand, it's clear critics are divided over this "quickie" from Sam Mendes. JR Jones (Chicago Reader), Scott Tobias, Carrie Rickey (Phi. Inquirer), Roger Ebert, and The New Yorker's D. Denby give it favorable reviews. A.O. Scott (NY Times), Scott Foundas, R. Corliss (Time), and a few others didn't like it.

I liked Away We Go and found it easy to relate to the anxieties of a couple on the verge of becoming parents. It's easy to figure out where we disagree on this one, Chris. I couldn't possibly begin to approach an understanding of the view that proclaims, regarding the protagonic couple, that "there's no there there."

Chris Knipp
06-28-2009, 06:12 PM
That's a provocative remark and I should have explained what I mean by it in my review. What I meant is though pleasant and appealing, Burt and Verona don't stand for anything, have no interests, have no discernible histories, and have no plans. Their occupations, medical illustration and selling insurance futures, are just tacked on. Having a child on the way is the only life they have. Fine for them, and typical of young couples, but uninteresting for us. Their lack of depth is only emphasized because the other people are simplistically presented; they're all skewed and most are caricatures. Every other person turns out to be a write-off, so that having no place to settle, they choose a place where they know no one. Their voyage of exploration is thus a failure, revealing only that only they matter. Since they have no people they like, they like and rely on themselves. So they have that strength, if you will. But as characters they aren't interesting. They're blanks, as much at the end as at the beginning. They know why they're terribly important but tha audience doesn't. To like them because they're young and about the have a kid is natural but is on the same level as cooing at a baby in a stroller.

I didn't study reviews before or after writing mine. The popular or critical success of the movie is irrelevant to me but the box office take seems somewhat modest? And the Metacritic rating is 57, so your tally of reviews may be a bit misleading. Anyway I don't care. THE LIMITS OF CONTROL gets a disastrous Metacritic 40 (but high praise from Hoberman) and I still consider it one of the three best American films of the year, the other two being TWO LOVERS and GOODBYE, SOLO.

That other road flick SIDEWAYS I listed as Most Overrated (for 2004) at an extravagant Metacritic 94, however, it is really a very good film, a much better one than AWAY WE GO in all aspects. But I don't have to worry about AWAY WE GO being overrated. 57 isn't a high score.