PDA

View Full Version : Films by Jan Troell (2007) and Andrzej Wajda (2007)



Chris Knipp
03-09-2009, 11:11 AM
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/9065/rjs7.jpg

Andrzej Wajda's KATYN and Jan Troell's EVERLASTING MOMENTS

Neo-retro treasures

Review by Chris Knipp

Even Eric Schmidt, Chairman and CEO of the Internet giant Google, has recently told Charlie Rose that he knows no better way how to learn about something than--brace yourself--reading a book. (Take that, Kindle.) Audiophiles know that vinyl still sounds better than CD's, which sound better than MP3, though these new technologies have their place. Their introduction stimulates the economy; they work better in certain contexts; they inspire new interest in the material they bear. A new pen might have inspired one to write. A new computer may inspire one to do more research (or write). We don't have dip pens much any more, but they do still exist and there is very, very often a continuing use of so-called "outmoded" technologies. . We still have fountain pens. We still need pencils.

And so it is with styles. Just as photography has not wiped out painting, non-objective painting has not wiped out magic realism. Rap hasn't eliminated pretty tunes. And so it is with movies. Old-fashioned ones still have their place. But with style, if you're going to be retro, you have to prove you had a good reason for it. Andrzej Wajda's Katyn (2007) and Jan Troell's Everlasting Moments(2008) are test cases on this issue. One justifies itself more quickly than the other. Both are new movies that are traditional in their look, outlook, pace, and subject matter. Katyn proves its worth more clearly, because it concerns an historical event that was hidden from view. The massacre of Polish officers by Russians in WWII and the attempt to blame it all on the Germans is history that needed to be told; it's the history of Wajda's own father, one of the slaughtered officers. Troell's film, concerning a working class Swedish family early in the last century, isn't quite as essential. It's Hallmark-sounding title is a hint that it's more nostalgia than history, and the story it tells, of a boorish husband and a wife struggling for independence, is in some ways only marginally memorable.

Katyn is a very fine film. It presents the atrocity before, during, and after through families and individuals. It depicts how people risked torture or extermination to resist the coverup, and it ends with devastating simplicity by re-staging how the killing was done, very specifically what it looked and sounded like. Not much in Katyn either in content or style seems distinctly 21st century. Except for one thing: this story hasn't been told before. Now it has been, and beautifully. And since it concerns events of sixty years ago, an old fashioned style is appropriate to it, as well as being a style of which Wajda is a master. The film may seem retro and boring to young viewers. Their cry, and others', sometimes is that WWII especially the Holocaust (which perhaps by association links in with other massacres of the War), has been "done to death." (This is mainly just because there have been four or five well-promoted films on the subject in recent months.) But that is really nonsense. Some subjects are never sufficiently examined and can never be overdone as long as an artist with a fresh angle "does" it.

It's valid however, to say that Jan Troell's earlier period family sagas were richer and more involving than his new Everlasting Moments. The whole thing is that this film is about a pretty ordinary Swedish family. The interest of the film isn't so much in the small-town working class family, the seven kids, the big womanizing drunkard father. It's primarily in the interface between the wife, Maria Larsson (Maria Heiskanen) and the film's style. Heiskanen's face, often and lovingly filmed in closeup, is more memorable than any of the faces in Katyn. The visuals consciously (and often remarkably) echo the subtle, even, naturally lighted tonalities of old glass plate negatives. (Early photographic equipment isn't as handy as today's, but that doesn't mean the photographs were inferior aesthetically.)

Maria, wife of the cheery, powerful, but dangerous Sigge (Mikael Persbrandt), marries him owning a valuable camera she's won. When things get tough, she decides to sell it. This leads her to go to Sebastian Pedersen (Jesper Christensen), a photographer with a shop, who refuses to let her sell it and instead takes her under his wing and falls quietly in love with her. Throughout the film and Sigge's skullduggeries and the family's economic travails, Maria uses the camera with increasing artistry. Along with this, the sweet platonic love affair with Sebastian continues, and he woos her with equipment, paper, plates, and lessons in developing photographs. The film is a celebration of the addictiveness of photography and the magic that happens in the darkroom. (Alas for digital camera users, to have lost that alchemical mystery!)

The relationship between Maria and Sebastian would be worth a subtler, richer film by itself. But Troell likes family sagas. And history and sociology call upon him to focus on Sigge and the seven children. Unfortunately, though, the story is narrated by eldest daughter Maja (Callin Ohrvall), adding logic to the focus on the mother, few of the other children are well individualized. The film is somewhat at cross purposes this way, with its unique story about a woman artist who's also a passionately dedicated mother and its lumbering family history. Unlike other Troell films this feels partly too long and partly too short. But despite the conventional, old fashioned filmmaking or perhaps because of it, the photographic story and the counterpoint in the film's own onscreen images, Everlasting Moments more than justifies its existence. Perhaps not as historically essential as Wajda's Karyn, for many of us, and particularly for a lover of still photography (and darkroom magic) like myself, Troell's film, whether "essential" or not, winds up being more emotionally involving.

oscar jubis
03-09-2009, 04:41 PM
I'm glad you liked Katyn and I'm glad it's (finally) being distributed. Here's my review, originally posted as part of 2008 MIFF coverage.

KATYN (POLAND)

The renowned Andrzej Wajda has been a filmmaker since 1950 but it wasn't until last year that he managed to complete the film he absolutely had to make. When the 82 year-old director was a country boy of 14, his father became of the 12,000 officers (some say 20,000) murdered in the Katyn forest. The mass graves were discovered in 1943, three years after the massacre, by German troops.

I became aware of this terrible historical event a few years ago from a rather unlikely source: Dusan Makavejev's 1974 film Sweet Movie, which includes footage of the german soldiers digging out the bodies of the Polish officers. The Yugoslav director's irreverent, polemical film was banned in all Soviet block countries. In 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev acknowledge that the massacred was ordered by Stalin; documents proving so became public. However, during the preceding half century, the Soviet Union blamed it on the Nazis and put into practice a massive campaign to cover up their culpability.

None of this constitutes a spoiler for Katyn audiences. Wajda's film includes this background information in pre-credits text. The compelling opening scene dramatizes the plight of Poles during WWII when they were almost simultaneously invaded from the West by the Nazis and from the East by the Soviets. It's set on a bridge where groups of Poles running away from invading troops in opposite directions meet in chaotic confusion. Katyn then tells the story of a woman who finally locates her officer husband, begs him to escape with her and their daughter, and grieves after he decides he must remain with his platoon. It soon becomes apparent that Wajda has many stories to tell and that his film is a narrative mosaic without a single protagonist. The father of an officer, a professor, gets summoned to a meeting at the University, and is summarily arrested and sent to a camp along with dozens of colleagues. The sister of another officer who's been missing for years won't rest until there's a gravestone conmemorating his passing. Katyn is both about the massacre and the systemic concealment that followed. A youth writes "murdered by the Soviets in Katyn" next to the word "father" in his college application, refuses orders to erase it, runs into the street, tears out a Soviet-propaganda poster and gets shot. Katyn moves back and forth in time, from one harrowing episode to the next. It's a magnificently mounted film with crisp, assured editing and expert lensing (The Pianist's Pawel Edelman). As would be expected, Katyn ends with a very realistic depiction of the massacre. It lasts 15 to 20 minutes and it's a stunning sequence of undeniable power that rivals any of the filmed dramatizations of the Holocaust.

Katyn doesn't strive for suspense and, like all of Wajda's films, it can be enjoyed by the whole world but it's made resolutely with a Polish audience in mind. Katyn was enormously successful when it was released in Poland last fall and was one of the five films nominated for an Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film. It has yet to secure distribution in the US though. I think that mostly the reason derives from Wajda's apparent aim to make the ultimate and definitive 2-hour Katyn movie. Unlike Polanski's The Pianist, there isn't a character one follows throughout the movie who can serve as a guide through events that would be unfamiliar to many among foreign audiences. I think most viewers outside Poland will experience some confusion at times. Consequently some episodes don't register with maximum impact. Katyn is worthy of admiration for presenting such a comprehensive and technically brilliant picture of the subject and its ramifications. Yet I think that Katyn would be really great if it was longer, with more expository material and a more stately pace. I wonder if young Poles, Wajda's acknowledged and declared target audience, would also feel this way.

Chris Knipp
03-09-2009, 06:16 PM
I don't know when people will see it in theaters. It's only showing at Film Forum in NYC at present.

Poland.pl says (http://www.poland.pl/news/article,Wajdas_Katyn_in_US_distribution,id,367019. htm)
An initial two-week run is scheduled, with four screenings a day. The film’s distributor, Koch Lorber Films, is planning to show Katyn in small studio cinemas in Pittsburg, Columbus, New Rocky and several other towns. At a later date the film is to go on release in Chicago, Boston and other big cities. I didn't mention that Wajda is 83f (or was 82 when he made this). Neither did you. David Denby makes use of the age factor in his March 2, 2009 New Yorker magazine review (http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2009/03/02/090302crci_cinema_denby) of KATYN:
The scenes are curt, decisive, and unsentimental to the point of bluntness. Katyń has the severity of an old man's work—forceful plain statement and implication convey all that Wajda wants to say. That seems a reasonable interpretation.

How long is the massacre sequence, 15 or 20 minutes? In moveis, that's a big difference. Reports differ but I'd say 15.

The bridge scene is often commented upon. Has a Fifties feel, to me. Not convincing, but as ritual effective.