PDA

View Full Version : Wes Anderson's THE DARJEELING LIMITED



mouton
10-13-2007, 08:17 PM
THE DARJEELING LIMITED
Written by Wes Anderson, Roman Coppola and Jason Schwartzman
Directed by Wes Anderson

Jack: I wonder if the three of us could have been friends in real life – not as brothers but as real people.
Peter: I don’t know. We probably would have had a better chance.

Let’s make an agreement. Wes Anderson is a talented filmmaker. He has a distinct vision that may not be for everyone’s taste but his films are always colorful and his writing is always exploratory. His characters are usually bizarre exaggerations of downtrodden souls struggling to get back to the surface. The situations they find themselves in are far removed from the realities of the audiences that flock to enjoy them. The same faces reappear in film after film, from Bill Murray and Owen Wilson to Anjelica Huston and Jason Schwartzman, making his films feel at times like you’re hanging with the cool crowd. Their cool factor is only upped when they find themselves staring directly ahead in close-ups in the foreground of the screen – one of Anderson’s signature visual styles. All of these factors either delight Anderson’s numerous fans by appealing to their desire to revel in offbeat humour or repel his detractors who consider his work to be pretentious and empty. Keeping with the film’s spirit of healing and progress, I propose we leave what we know of Anderson behind us and open our minds to THE DARJEELING LIMITED – his most accomplished and satisfying film. Can we agree to that?

Wilson is Francis, the matriarch of sorts to Shwartzman’s Jack and Adam Brody’s Peter. He has convinced his two brothers to join him on a spiritual journey through India aboard a train by the name of The Darjeeling Limited. The last time they were all together was a year prior, at their father’s funeral. None have healed fully from the experience and it is Francis’ intention to reconnect the threesome so that they can all move forward together. Albeit a well-intentioned concept, the damage done by their family dynamics throughout the years has made it near impossible for them to trust each other. Whenever one is absent from the trio, the two remaining take the opportunity to share something they don’t want the missing brother to know. It’s as if they are choosing the brother they know will handle whatever news they are imparting better. Realistically though, they each know that the moment they leave the room, the brother they told will tell they brother they avoided telling everything. In that regard, they do want to share with the group but they just don’t feel comfortable doing it directly. They play these boyish games while rejecting the need for Francis’ persistent mothering but whether they are buying poisonous snakes at village markets or chasing each other through adjoining train cars, it is clear that there are still many stops before maturity.

When the brothers are not busy sifting through the manipulation, they are seeking out spiritual enlightenment. With its rich tapestry of golds, blues and yellows, India makes for the perfect place for them to lose themselves with hopes of rebuilding. However, the copious amounts of extra-strength, locally found drugs the three share suggest that they aren’t quite finished numbing their pain just yet. Regardless, the journey itself and its intended purpose imply that healing is desperately needed. What the boys don’t realize is that healing can’t be forced. They visit temple after temple and partake in many a ritual hoping to put their past to rest without actually talking about or facing their very real issues. They’re trying so hard though and they clearly want it so bad, need it even. As they struggle to force it, it only seems to get further away from them. An urgency and a hope results in the viewer. These are likable guys and you want them to get what they need. In that respect, Anderson places you directly on the train along with them so that you too are along for the ride.

THE DARJEELING LIMITED is not a train wreck in the least. In fact, it is the opposite. It is a scenic ride that chugs along toward inner peace. The lull of the train serves to calm the chaos and it soothes the viewer as it does the brothers. With the train constantly moving forward, Francis, Peter and Jack will inevitably reach their destination, even though they don’t really know what that is. And with the speed it’s moving at, they can’t get off even though they might want to. Lucky for them, with Anderson wearing the conductor’s hat, there is no chance the train will be derailed.

www.blacksheepreviews.com

Chris Knipp
10-20-2007, 07:19 AM
It was the opener for the NYFF and I covered it in the Festival thread:

http://www.filmwurld.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=18570#post18570

mouton
10-21-2007, 10:11 AM
Great review, Chris. You were certainly all over the NYFF ... great coverage. I only managed to catch Margot at the Wedding while I was there but that was well worth it.

I must say I am disappointed that Darjeeling is not being as well received as I think it should be. I genuinely felt it was enchanting and cathartic. So much more open to a broad audience than his past work. Yet, all I am reading is how it will likely satisfy Anderson fans but not much else. I went with non-Anderson fans and they even enjoyed it. So I feel like many will mis out on this wonderful film, as a result. Lots of films disappear that shouldn't but people will genuinely miss out here.

Chris Knipp
10-22-2007, 03:48 AM
Thanks. It is possible to be "all over" the Nyff; that's what I like so much about it, that seeing and reviewing up to the minute all its Official Selections is do-able. What I couldn't do was see more than one or two of the sidebar series films. Margot was not one of my faves--the on the scene press consensus seemed to be with me, negative; but I can understand your interest. At least I got to see Nicole Kidman in the flesh!

I think people think Wes Anderson is self-indulgent, which in a way he is; and that he is repeating himself, which in a way he also is--though really Darjeeling is so different in feel from his previous work. The Metacritic rating is 67, which is certainly disappointing, but not horrible. In box office, it seems to have grossed close to $4 million, which isn't bad--twice the take of Jesse James I believe.

mouton
10-22-2007, 07:07 AM
... which can lead into a whole other discussion about why films this fall do not seem to be connecting with audiences. So many art films, including Darjeeling and Jesse James, are widening their theatre counts to luke warm box office. Is it that the films aren't that great? That they're more critical darlings than anything else? Or that they're just not being marketed well? Aside from Across the Universe, which you know how I feel about already, no art house entries are breaking out past their art crowds.

ps. I enjoyed Margot but was not floored by it. Seeing Noan Baumback in the flesh (as I caught the Monday screening) was reward enough for me.

oscar jubis
10-22-2007, 10:45 AM
Thinking about Wes Anderson films as a whole, one finds a basic essential preoccupation with a young man in relationship with a failed father figure. This theme was explored to considerable emotional impact in Anderson's sophomore, and still best, film Rushmore, which was particularly provocative in that the father figure played by Bill Murray also becomes the young man's romantic rival. The follow-up, The Royal Tennenbaums concerns an actual father who strives to win back his wife and three kids. It was less moving than Rushmore and marked the beginning of Anderson's somewhat questionable reliance on quirks and style choices to define characters. But it was funnier and more elaborate, without losing the bittersweet tone that had by then become his trademark. In The Life aquatic with Steve Zissou, Anderson got derailed. Bill Murray returns as the father figure to Owen Wilson's "bastard" son. The triangle from Rushmore is basicallly replicated when a single-mom-to-be (Cate Blanchett) comes aboard. But the film drifts from amusing vignette to indulgent sequence, and Anderson seems more concerned about set decoration than narrative or characterization.

Anderson's new film, The Darjeeling Limited seems to me like a step in the right direction, but only a step. Anderson's beloved spoiled neurotics are still basically defined by their quirks but he maintains the right tone of bemused melancholy. India's soulfulness, no matter how stylized the milieu, gives the film a certain warmth missing from the self-consciously mannerist The Life Aquatic. This time the father is dead but his absence weighs heavily on three brothers (Owen Wilson, Jason Schwatzman, Adam Brody) who are experiencing personal crises and have been out of touch for a while. The would-be father figure (Bill Murray, again) fails to get on board in the opening sequence so we focus on the brothers' bonding and their engagement with India and its people. In The Darjeeling Limited, the cross-generational feud involves mother (Anjelica Huston), who failed to attend her husband's funeral, but it's really no more than a secondary thread in the meandering narrative. While I find Anderson's films overly precious, his obvious affection for his characters is quite endearing. When the characters are not overwhelmed by the set pieces and the painstaking art direction, as it's mostly the case here, his films are enjoyable. The Darjeeling Limited is not quite a return to the form of Rushmore and, to a lesser extent, The Royal Tennebaums, but it gives me hope Anderson will get there again.

*Wes Anderson is very eclectic in his choice of music. Some of the music used in The Darjeeling Limited comes from the scores of a couple of films by the great Satyajit Ray, otherwise he uses several 60s pop/rock songs. The one overheard during the opening credits is a relatively obscure Kinks song (it was not one of the 17 songs the British group released as singles). The lovely tune is called "This Time Tomorrow" and I'm curious as to the decision to feature it. Did Anderson "discover" it while watching Garrel's Regular Lovers, the first film in which the song was used? It's not a song that ever got radio airplay. Perhaps he's a devoted Kinks fan like me...

Johann
10-29-2007, 09:29 AM
The Kinks Rule.

Get your hands on Face to Face and The Kinks are the Village Green Preservation Society.
Underrated, underappreciated and underpromoted in their time, the Kinks are what Pete Townshend called "more quintessentially English than either the Beatles, Stones or the Who".

My favorite track by them is "Waterloo Sunset" but there are so many awesome tunes by them. Ray Davies is a genius. A true genius. And he's still touring now and again.

Graham Nash also said that when he heard "You Really Got Me" he knew the Kinks were destined for greatness.
Sad that they aren't more well known.
Glad to hear Wes Anderson has used them for his new one.

It reminds me of Queens of the Stone Age's album
Songs for the Deaf- nobody knows who they are so the songs fall on deaf ears...



Let's all drink to the death of a clown...

oscar jubis
10-29-2007, 10:00 AM
Fave Kinks album is still THE KINK KRONIKLES, which of course includes "Waterloo Sunset." I'd probably pick FACE TO FACE as second fave.

"This Time Tomorrow" is buried on side two of the LOLA VS. POWERMAN AND THE MERRY-GO-ROUND album, which says a lot about what a good songwriter Davies is/was.

Johann
10-29-2007, 10:08 AM
Who doesn't like "Lola"?

How about "Dedicated Follower of Fashion"?
or "A Well Respected Man":
"'Cuz he gets up in the morning, and he goes to work at nine..."

And of course "Come Dancing"- a song that resurrected the Kinks in the 80's. Just brilliant music from those guys, who had a lot of struggles as a band and as people. The story of the Kinks is an amazing one..

"Apeman" and "Sunny Afternoon" are also awesome songs.