PDA

View Full Version : David Cronenberg: EASTERN PROMISES



mouton
09-22-2007, 12:57 PM
EASTERN PROMISES
Written by Steven Knight
Directed by David Cronenberg

Nikolai: Nice bike. How much do you want for it?
Anna: It has sentimental value.
Nikolai: Sentimental value … I’ve heard of that.

When it comes to films made by veteran Canadian director, David Cronenberg, certain promises are expected to be kept. The name promises something dark and twisted, something gruesome and haunting, something disturbing and seductive. Cronenberg’s latest, EASTERN PROMISES, certainly makes good on all these accounts and solidifies his new, more linear but no less disconcerting approach to filmmaking. Gone are the days of surreal experiments where fetishists get off on colliding cars and the ensuing scars or twin gynecologists playing patients for patsies. Now is the time for the Russian mafia in London to be given a human touch. No, now Mr. Cronenberg is not so concerned with being bizarre as he is with being blunt. As with his last masterpiece, A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, Cronenberg has made PROMISES into a straightforward story and morality tale, much to the dismay of film students everywhere. Fear not though, students. Accessibility does not make Cronenberg irrelevant. If anything, it means that brilliantly polished stories about the underbelly of humanity can be told without any unnecessary sentiment, allowing for them to be both provocative and bloody as all hell.

It rains just as much in Cronenberg’s London as it does in the real London. The rain ushers in the heavy yet steady hand of this director, whose work always seems to be weighed down by a looming sense of despair and discomfort. Still, though the viewer is pulled into a world where cutting the tips off of fingers and slitting throats is just as normal as a well-balanced breakfast, nothing is so simple as good and evil as absolutes. Like the sky the rain is falling from, everyone is surrounded by an ambiguous grey. Naomi Watts plays a mid-wife named Anna. On one tragic evening, Anna helps to bring a baby into the world at the expense of the very young, heroine-addicted mother’s life. She does not want to see the child fall into the system as the girl cannot be identified to find her next of kin so she makes it her mission to find the girl’s family before this can happen. It may all seem noble but her saintly act also serves to appease the pain she has felt since the miscarriage of her own child months before. She couldn’t save her baby but she can certainly try to help this one. Her search leads her directly to the door of the Russian mafia and this is where she meets Nikolai (Viggo Mortensen). At the moment, Nikolai is just the driver but he’s got hopes to one day be part of the real family. He would be perfect for the job as he is calculated and cold when he needs to be but then again not so as he also takes the time to encourage the slave sex-worker he’s just been with to find a better life. People are complicated; Cronenberg knows this and this is what gives EASTERN PROMISES its depth.

Though regular Cronenberg cinematographer, Peter Suschitzky, guides EASTERN PROMISES with a tranquil glide that sets the pace as both unnerving and engrossing, it is Mortensens’s performance as an aspiring mafioso with a nagging sense of compassion that is most memorable and moving. His face is harsh and guarded behind his dark sunglasses and beneath his slicked back, immaculately placed hair lies a mystery that is being heavily protected. His presence is daunting as he steps from a black town car, dressed to match, from his shoes to his gloves. He is naturally imposing and his icy composure and unflinching dedication to his superiors make him frightening without really trying. He is not so much trying to intimidate others into submission though but rather to keep them away. Yet there is something about him that inspires those around him to see a reason to trust him. Perhaps it is his reliability or perhaps it is just that you know once you meet him that you would rather have him on your side than on the other. Mortensen, working with Cronenberg for the second time after his tortured performance in A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, is transformed and nearly unrecognizable as Nikolai. And while his character is extremely guarded, he still manages to find himself in a very naked position before the film’s end, in what is a shocking and exhilarating fight sequence that finds Cronenberg, as God, going after Nikolai when he is at his most vulnerable. Proving himself to be a vengeful God, Cronenberg punishes his character for allowing himself to relax for three seconds to appreciate his success.

The fight sequence is already being heralded as one for the books that will be talked about for years to come. I have a feeling we will be hearing just as much talk about Mortensen’s performance, Steven Knight’s script and Cronenberg’s direction come awards season. After setting the groundwork with A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE (which I actually do prefer over EASTERN PROMISES just because it left me with more on my mind), the mainstream film community seems finally ready to reward one of its veteran contributors. If you’re going to sell out, I can’t imagine a better way to do it.

www.blacksheepreviews.com

oscar jubis
09-27-2007, 11:49 AM
EASTERN PROMISES

"I've said it before and I hope to say it again: David Cronenberg is the most provocative, original and consistently excellent North American director of his generation" (J. Hoberman, Village Voice)

Cronenberg's generation includes Scorsese and Spielberg, and I cannot imagine either filmmaker delivering such a lean and taut film out of this material. Eastern Promises is 92 fat-free minutes long and doesn't have a single expendable frame. As a gangster film, it is absolutely perfect. But, is it fair to place it in a genre box? Hoberman states Eastern Promises is deceptively generic while Jonathan Rosenbaum considers it a lesser film than A History of Violence because it lacks the latter's "theoretical dimension". I agree with both statements.

There are engrossing elements in the film that cannot be regarded as "gangster flick" conventions. Elements that one usually finds in family dramas (not that Cronenberg is the first director to combine features of both genres). Many reviews of the film appear to give insufficient attention to the character of Anna. When she returns home with Tatiana's diary, Stepan asks her: "Do you always rob from the dead?" which acquires heft increasingly as one realizes she aims to replace the baby she miscarried with the one given birth by the 14 year-old immigrant. Doing so requires a pact with Mortensen's Nikolai, who introduces himself by words and actions as someone with no feelings then grows into a much more ambiguous character. Anna wonders if she's made a pact with a devil or an angel, and she might never find out. Then there's the triangle involving a Russian godfather (Armin Muller-Stahl), his troubled son and Nikolai. A scenario that is much more provocative because of the homosexual undercurrents between the two young men.

Rosenbaum's statement refers to the way in which Cronenberg's masterful A History of Violence advanced a thesis about the effects of violence on innocents (or regular people if you wish) and communities. The violence perpetrated by the Mortensen character in that film is deemed heroic by a whole community, at least initially, and it both excites and repels Mortensen's wife (a great performance by Maria Bello). The protagonist's mild-mannered teen son becomes contaminated by it, while the audience was skillfully implicated by our own reactions to the violence on screen. Eastern Promises lacks this reflective aspect and it is easier to walk away from it with clean hands. It's nonetheless a great movie, which offers plenty of evidence to support Hoberman's contention that Cronenberg is the best North American director of his generation.

Chris Knipp
09-30-2007, 12:56 PM
EASTERN PROMISES isn’t as brilliant as come of Cronenberg’s fans, still dazzled by his History of Violence, seem to think, but it’s a compelling if repulsive yarn with a new set of evil men (Russian mafia in London) set off against the goodness of Naomi Watts’ innocent young midwife, of half-Russian heritage herself, who is led in by the death of a young pregnant woman in her hospital to Armin Mueller-Stahl’s gang boss, Vincent Cassell’s messy, groveling son, and Viggo Mortensen’s cool, mysterious "driver." Steven Knight, who penned Stephen Frears’ Dirty Pretty Things, again weaves good guys in with bad guys nicely enough but (also again) doesn't really get under anybody's skin. The editing and visual style aren’t exceptional but the mise-en-scene is great and there are some striking tableaux and camera angles. There's also momentum (as well as more gruesomeness than befits a moral tale). The nude knife fight in the steam bath with its eye-popping finale is a stunner, but there’s only cold comfort here.

tabuno
09-30-2007, 07:53 PM
It was a tough call, especially when I was reminded of the sex scenes found in HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, but EASTERN PROMISES exceeds where HISTORY OF VIOLENCE not EASTERN PROMISES strangely enough is the cliche. It is Ed Harris that is cliche in his role as bad person in HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, not Armin Mueller-Stahl in EASTERN PROMISES. The audience isn't subjected to great bouts of sex as in HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, typical of many violent American movies (sex, violence, and love) and one of the best scenes of the movie as the fight scene in EASTERN PROMISES that promises to be talked about long after this movie's release. Even Vincent Cassel's character that could have been cliche wasn't really, his character has fine nuances and depth that made it more exceptional than cliche. Overall, it is EASTERN PROMISES avoidance of generic roles using the plot script, direction, acting itself that makes the movie interesting.

oscar jubis
09-30-2007, 10:57 PM
Audiences SUBJECTED to GREAT BOUTS of sex? C'mon!! This sounds so... VICTORIAN.

Each film has essential (well in Cronenberg's films EVERYTHING is essential) sex scenes that reveal character nuances. In A History of Violence, Maria Bello is turned on by her husband disarming two thugs at the coffee shop and puts on her old cheerleader outfit to have sex. The second sex scene is markedly different, because what she has learned about her husband, which she finds repellent, complicates her physical attraction to him.

Eastern Promises has a single sex scene and it's magnificent because it illustrates the gang boss' son's power over Nikolai and how watching him fuck a sex-worker vicariously satisfies his homosexual urges. It's a magnificent, absolutely essential scene in terms of conveying character psychology.

tabuno
10-01-2007, 02:45 AM
Didn't I write "GREAT" Bouts of Sex. I really meant it "GREAT" or I wouldn't have put the word in.