PDA

View Full Version : Billy Ray: Breach (2007)



Chris Knipp
03-10-2007, 12:58 PM
BILLY RAY: BREACH (2007)

Satan wears gray

Review by Chris Knipp

Billy Ray is interested in betrayal. His previous film, the 2003 Shattered Glass, concerned the young New Republic writer who got caught out making a name for himself by inventing fake stories. Stephen Glass betrayed the trust of all his editors and wrecked his own career. Ray has gone into darker territory with Robert Hanssen -- the worst spy in US history, a puzzling and profoundly repellent man. Hanssen betrayed his agency, his government, and his country and sold millions of dollars worth of secrets to Russia. As Breach begins, the FBI, for which he works, has pinpointed Hanssen and transferred him out of the action, but supervisor Kate Burroughs (Laura Linney), part of a team seeking to gather evidence to convict him, tells his new assistant, rookie agent-trainee Eric O'Neill (Ryan Phillippe) only that his new boss is a sex deviant. This is true, but relatively minor. Later O'Neill learns the whole story, and then with his knowledge and proximity to the target, the tension mounts. O'Neill may seem a harmless if dedicated drone, but in collecting evidence against Hanssen his role becomes crucial.

The recent and fine German film The Lives of Others is another take on spying as it pervaded the lives of those behind the Berlin Wall. The world of secrecy and mistrust deemed necessary by the guardians of empire is not a safe world but one in which betrayals can be hidden and dangers multiplied. It's a world so foolish in The Lives of Others a devious man sets another drone to watching the country's most loyal intellectual, and in Breach an earlier committee to find the leak was headed by Hanssen himself.

The spy world is not only absurd and menacing but abnormally constricted. Breach is a color film that's so gray and dull you remember it as black and white, but the grayness is evocative and chilling. This isn't about car chases and gangs of armed men closing in on an abandoned building. It's about dining out with a buttoned-down monster, being lectured on Catholicism by a man who sends someone tapes of himself having sex with is wife. It's photocopying, anxious downloading off a palm pilot, taping secrets up in garbage bags and leaving them under bridges in a DC park. It's covering up who's calling when a beeper goes off. It's not successes so much as it's avoiding errors. It's living with paranoia, but not with action. This grayness is Breach's triumph. Here at last is an American account of what the hard relentless grind of real spying is like.

The film does generate some considerable excitement and suspense. After all, it's about the capture of a traitor. But what raises our pulses is just such things as the effort to keep Hanssen away while his car or his data are being gone over. No one is running. One of the tensest moments is in an off-highway DC traffic jam. The whole danger is that Hanssen may get out and walk. It's O'Neill's crucial job to talk him back into the car.

This in short is a film not of action but acting. All its power radiates out of Chris Cooper. He played a tormented, repressed fake patriot well in American Beauty. He has played cops or intelligence agency execs well often. But this time he's allowed to bring all these characteristics and all his special gifts together at center stage, and he's never nailed a better role. Cooper has an actor's oversensitive ravaged face, the kind that looks as if it's registered so many emotions it's gone slack, leaving only twitches of hidden fear and repressed rage. It's hard to imagine a better man for the role. He's been accused of overacting, but this is a guy near the end of his tether, an egomaniac virtually out of control. His state is set off against the restrained diligence of O'Neill. Phillippe, who played a young man hunting down hidden wrongdoing before in the 2001 computer conspiracy story Antitrust, is also well cast. He inhabits with some strength and restraint his role of young man hungry to be best, whose whole goal in life is to be promoted to Agent. There's no need for complexity in O'Neill: but isn't finding a role model and then discovering he's a world-class traitor pretty complex in itself? Laura Linney as his supervisor as usual is excellent, and these three actors carry the film.

A criticism that's been leveled at Breach is that Hanssen is incomprehensible. That's quite incorrect: he himself lists all his motives at the moment of capture, while concluding that none matter: he's a spy, that's all we need to know. What these critics mean is they can't project themselves into this character. Hanssen is interesting -- troubling -- not sympathetic. He is like Milton's Satan. Inside is a whirlwind of contradiction and torment. Breach is far simpler than Robert De Niro's CIA epic The Good Shepherd and perhaps better, truer. But the two films compliment each other. Both examine tormented individual lives to show what American spy-craft and counterintelligence are and have been like. The breathless Bourne franchise and Le Carré's stylish cold war meditations are fun, but this gets closer to the real thing.

©Chris Knipp 2007

oscar jubis
03-26-2007, 07:39 PM
I enjoyed the film, mostly but not exclusively thanks to Chris Cooper. Yet the two quotes below aren't entirely without merit.

"Yet the unexciting look and feel of the movie wouldn’t have bothered me if the filmmakers had penetrated Hanssen’s skull a little."
David Denby

"Robert Hanssen is now serving a life sentence for his long career as a Russian and Soviet spy, but this rote thriller implies he should have done prison time just for being Catholic."
J.R. Jones

tabuno
06-25-2007, 05:10 PM
Copied and originally Posted on its original a thread:

Breach (2007)

Chris Cooper gets an amazing script that focuses on the psychological espionage film instead of an action-thriller. While not as convoluted as Le Carre movies, this rather more straight forward spy movie is filled with great acting with an emphasis on the complexity of human behavior, nuances that promote the talents of its characters. Chris portrays Robert Hanssen in a densely rich performance that he captures in both his narrative and silent expressions on screen. There are two great psychological moments in this film that substitute for the physical actions and special effects of other movies. One of the best movies of 2007, Chris deserves another performance nomination for this one.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

06-24-2007 11:39 PM

Chris Knipp describes a much darker Robert Hanssen role than that portrayed by Chris Cooper. Some of the fascinating scenes occur when Chris Cooper has Mr. Hanssen demonstrating his concern for Phillipe's character (Eric O'Neill) so that instead of Mr. Hanssen being a totally "repellent" man, "button-downed monster," Mr. Cooper has presented him in a sympathetic role, someone with a heart in the same fashion as Anthony Hopkins as the fictional Hannibal Lecktor but in much more real human compassionate terms unlike Lecktor's more superficial stylish tasteful demeanor.

Chris Knipp
06-25-2007, 06:01 PM
Indeed the bonding between Philippe's character and Cooper's does more than anything else to humanize the portrayal of Hanssen, which clearly is open to various interpretations. But when you link him with Hannibal Lector as portrayed by Anthony Hopkins, I don't see much to argue with you about on this. Sure, he's nicer than "Hannibal the cannibal." But that the comparison occurs to you says something. A lot of us have had "buttoned-down monsters" in our lives at one time or another, but not many get to run with that role as far as Cooper as Hanssen does.

tabuno
06-25-2007, 06:56 PM
Cooper as Hanssen exceeds Anthony as Lecktor for me because there is more subtle reality rather than a fictional character such as Lecktor. Cooper had the real Eric O'Neil's experience and mirror back reflection on Cooper's performance to practice with. For Anthony, the fictional dramatization allowed him further leeway in terms of audience acceptance. For Cooper, his need to portray a real character in terms of a true story requires a higher standard of acting performance in order to gain audience appreciation and acceptance in this movie. In some ways, Lecktor is a more stereotypical character in a rich, tasteful Anthony way while Cooper's character is even more diverse and complex with the extent of emotions and behaviors the script requires. As such, Cooper's performance would easily meet the requirements of an performance award nomination.

Chris Knipp
06-26-2007, 12:11 AM
Certainly, I agree, though many people consider Hopkinns' Lector an iconic performance--it's not even really his best work, and Cooper's Hanssen stands with the best he's done, for sure.