PDA

View Full Version : Pedro, Pedro, Pedro: VOLVER



mouton
12-21-2006, 09:32 PM
VOLVER
Written and Directed by Pedro Almodovar


Spanish film auteur, Pedro Almodovar, has never shied away from death in the past. But never has he immersed himself and his viewers in so much of it before either, as he has in his latest work, VOLVER. Within the first ten or twenty minutes of the film, each scene revolves around death and how it surrounds us in time and space. Several women, including VOLVER’S heroines Raimunda and Sole (Penelope Cruz and Lola Duenas), clean the tombstones of their departed relatives during the opening credits. The graves these two clean belong to their parents who died in a fire four years prior. Their next stop after polishing the resting places of their parents, a visit to their aunt, whose visit here on earth is nearing its end. While on their visit, they drop in next door for tea with their aunt’s neighbor, Augustina (Blanco Portillo), who has cancer. She could die just as easily as Raimunda and Sole the next day but her fate seems more sealed than theirs. These sisters, neither one of which cares to deal with death, are haunted by past deaths, facing present ones and mentally avoiding those that wait in their future. The onslaught of death culminates when Raimunda returns home from her hard day to find her husband dead, more specifically, killed. Bear in mind, this is still the first twenty minutes. The seeds of complexity that enrich most of Almodovar’s work have been sewn but they too seem to die before their time. After Raimunda makes temporary arrangements for her husband’s body in an industrial-sized freezer, she seems to forget him there. The build is abruptly halted and what follows is a string of odd choices and events that make for an uncharacteristically lifeless experience.

The day after her husband’s death, Raimunda finds herself unexpectedly running a restaurant. For a moment, I feared I was about to be subjected to a WOMAN ON TOP sequel. Luckily, in the hands of the right director, Cruz can cook on screen without ruining the recipe. One could argue that what Raimunda does after she dumps her husband in the freezer is exactly what she’s been doing since her parents died. She is avoiding both reality and her pain. Almodovar will have none of that. His hand is always present and while Raimunda finds new life in a growing opportunity, a painful figure from her past returns. This figure is her mother, Irene (Carmen Maura). It is unclear whether her mother is back from the dead or just never died but what is clear is that Raimunda will now have the chance to face off against the demons she believed to be buried with her parents. The uncertainty of Irene’s life/death status brings out Almodovar’s playful side. You can feel him laughing at his characters’ confusion and all the while, laughing at ours as well. Yet at no time does he belittle the overwhelming impact of the return of a relative long thought to be dead.

The women of VOLVER continue the Almodovar tradition of being complex dichotomies of fragility and strength. Raimunda is a hard working mother who holds down as many jobs as is necessary to keep her family comfortable. Her happiness is never a priority though she seems content just being there for her daughter (Yohana Cabo). Cruz plays her with a sassy exterior protecting a sad little girl interior. She is a captivating beauty but her beauty overshadows the mess she should be considering everything she has to deal with. As the grand matriarch, Irene is perhaps the most fascinating of the bunch. She has spent the lest few years taking care of her sister and her return to Madrid allows her to get to know Sole again and make amends with Raimunda. Mothering people is what she does best yet her past with Raimunda, including an incident that scarred Raimunda without Irene ever knowing about it, has haunted her so intensely that a return was inevitable. Reluctantly, Raimunda has adopted her mother’s nurturing instincts despite herself. Watching her daughter face some of the same struggles she had to, forces her to face her past but neatly set it aside to ensure her daughter’s safety.

VOLVER is both enjoyable and meaningful to a degree but, like the lives of the people on the screen, it feels unfinished and melodramatic for the sake of the viewer and not the story itself. There is a fascination with trash television that runs throughout VOLVER. People cannot stand it but cannot look away, regardless of how it stumps their sleep or turns their stomachs. In some ways, VOLVER could be adapted into a trashy television miniseries. Somewhere buried beneath all of this death lies a secret. It is a secret that would only cause pain were it to be dug up. It is a secret that does not need to be shared with the rest of the world. Yet it is also a secret that, no matter how twisted it is, it needs to be unearthed so that all involved can move on. And while it is true that secrets that go to the grave cannot be kept secret by covering them with six feet of earth, these same secrets cannot be relied upon to give a film its ultimate meaning.

Chris Knipp
12-22-2006, 11:01 PM
I like what you said about a trashy TV series. I think this is the material Almodovar works with. On the other hand the film had two big and maybe relatively more serious purposes: to "volver," go home, to go back to the region of La Mancha that he came from and look at it again without the fear or horror he felt earlier in life when he had escaped from it; and to provide a glorious vehilcle for Penelope Cruz to play a voluptuous reincarnation of Sophia Loren or Gina Lollobrigida, with a macabre Chabrolesque twist. It succeeds in both these aims, the first primarily for the director; the second for us.

I reviewed Volver in the NYFF thread but I don't know how to link to individual posts. It's here (http://www.chrisknipp.com/writing/viewtopic.php?t=674). Almodovar had a lot to say at the NYFF Q&A and talked at length about both these aspects, especially the volver aspect of going back to La Mancha.

Chris Knipp
12-22-2006, 11:07 PM
P.s. Anna Magnani is another icon he links Cruz with, with a clip from Magnani in Bellissima. A review that goes into this a bit is one in The Boston Globe (http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2006/11/22/almodvar_returns_home_in_the_engaging_volver/) . And Cruz, who is rather slight (but a looker--I saw her up close in the lobby later) had her hips padded in the movie to be more like a luscious Italian babe.

mouton
12-23-2006, 05:45 PM
I had to see this movie a second time before reviewing it. I am just not as moved by this work as by some of his others. Considering how much I enjoyed ALL ABOUT MY MOTHER and BAD EDUCATION, the disappointment I felt after watching VOLVER was twice as strong as it should have been.

I did not know about Pedro's metaphoric return in VOLVER. This added level of meaning certainly makes the film more personal. God, you see all the greats, don't you? I got to get my ass out to New York more often apparently.

Chris Knipp
12-23-2006, 07:29 PM
Pedro put on a good show and it was cool to see Penelope up close.

I personally like Talk to Her the best. It took me a good long while to warm to Almodovar's style, though I could see from the beginning that he was unique. Talk to Her was the magical one for me. So I am not as crazy about Volver as some either. But it struck me that Pedro was nonetheless working fully up to speed, and his use of Penelope is excellent.

oscar jubis
12-24-2006, 01:21 PM
I still remember the gawky, shy, 18 year-old Penelope Cruz on the Gusman stage at the American premiere of Bigas Luna's Jamon Jamon (1992). She was cast opposite Javier Bardem as "la hija de puta" (the whore's daughter) in the best Almodovar film he never directed. Cruz made a big impression from the start; it was obvious to everyone she'd have a long and successful career.

Jamon Jamon received a limited release stateside but, on its heels came the more widely distributed Belle Epoque. Fernando Trueba's film won the Oscar for Best Foreign Film in 1994 and introduced Cruz to American audiences. In 1998, Penelope Cruz appeared in Mr. Trueba's masterful farce The Girl of Your Dreams, an artistic breakthrough for her. The film won 7 Spanish Academy awards including Best Actress for Cruz. It was her first truly adult role, playing the leading actress of a Spanish troupe sent to Nazi Germany to make a film at Berlin's legendary UFA studio. (The Girl of Your Dreams also had its American premiere at the Miami Int. Film Festival then, inexplicably, failed to gain US distribution. It has since been released on dvd and it's not to be missed). Cruz has since appeared in a number of Hollywood productions, some better than others, and two previous films by Pedro Almodovar.

In Ms. Cruz's third appearance in Almodovar's films, we witness her ascendance from accomplished actress to iconic diva. In Volver, her Raimunda is an updated version of the resourceful, working-class women created by Ana Magnani (Open City, The Rose Tattoo) and Sophia Loren (Two Women). She's an emblem of Mediterranean womanhood. A fiercely determined, sensual, warm, vibrant woman at the center of a film in which corpse disposal is put on hold because 30 hungry mouths turn up and they simply need to be fed. The cute, international star disappears behind Raimunda to create a wholly believable, fully dimensional character. I almost came to tears during her rendition of Carlos Gardel's titular "Volver", even though it was immediately apparent the actress was lipsynching. Cruz is dressed and coiffed to remind us of la Loren of the 1960s, and Almodovar seems to regard the whole Cannes-winning ensemble as if he was Cukor making The Women.

Actually, the most direct cinema reference concerns Carmen Maura, who has inspired Almodovar since he was a telephone operator and she was an actress is a small theatrical troupe. Irene (Maura) watches Visconti's Bellissima, a film in which Ana Magnani takes her daughter to an audition at Cinecitta studios. In Volver, there are a number of references to Raimunda being taken by mom to an audition and the rift between mother and daughter that occurred at that time.

Indeed, in Volver, Almodovar develops a number of correspondences and parallels between the present and a past that has left indelible marks. The tracking shot at a cementary during All Souls Day, in which widows treat the dead as if they never left, introduces the theme of the co-existence of past and present and prepares the viewer for the return of Irene to her daughters' lives. As it has been widely discussed, in Volver, Almodovar fully comes to terms with his origins as a boy growing up in tiny Calzada de Calatrava, feeling "como un astronauta", like an astronaut in a distant planet. He returns to play tribute to the land and the magnanimous women who raised him.

Chris Knipp
12-24-2006, 08:07 PM
I pointed some of these things out in my review of the movie.Quoting myself here:
If you want to know what’s new in Volver in a nutshell, you might consider it Italian neorealism blended with a murder thriller à la Chabrol. It’s also been described by the filmmaker as a combination of Mildred Pierce and Arsenic and Old Lace. There is a corpse to dispose of, with consequences that are both comic and chilling. There is a working class setting in which Penélope Cruz’s Raimunda reigns, a gorgeous queen bee, tough yet sensitive, with “cleavage for days” as Julia Roberts described her look in Erin Brockovich. Penelope’s look and dress are conscious references to Sophia Loren, and the film includes a clip of Visconti’s Bellissima with Anna Magnani. These idealized "housewives" or film Super Moms are imbedded in the village world Almodóvar creates here. But needless to say, the intricate plot line into which these two elements of soulful lady and Chabrolesque murder story are blended into a brightly-hued Almodóvar "naturalism" is unique to this director.The connections drawn with earlier works have been pointed out quite frequently of late in online dissussions of Volver. They were also brought out in the Q&A after the press screening with Richard Pena presiding and Almodovar expatiating at length in English and sometimes Spanish, ably translated by Pena. He was especially forthcoming about his feelings past and present about his region of origin.

I saw Jamon Jamon and remember it pretty vividly but don't htink I ever heard of Belle Epoque. Maybe Penelope's best career move was breaking up with Tom Cruise. Cruz and Cruise--bad comb o

oscar jubis
12-26-2006, 10:25 PM
You did a good job reviewing Volver and I'm glad you quoted yourself.
I think it's very original or unique that you remember Jamon Jamon and not Belle Epoque since the latter grossed six times as much as Jamon and won an Oscar.

Originally posted by Chris Knipp
I personally like Talk to Her the best.

I've seen every Almodovar film since Labyrinth of Passion ('82) at the time of release. It's been interesting to monitor the arc of his career as a filmmaker. He seems to disown his 70s films; even his official website doesn't list them. They amount to "student films", shot apparently in Super-8. They are expressions of a young man exercising his freedom to be outrageous and document cultural aspects of the post-Franco movement known as "la movida". The first three films he made in the 80s are still in that vein, slightly more sophisticated than the 70s films but still crude and outrageous. The first "important" film he made was What Have I Done to Deserve This? ('84). It evidences an advancement in Almodovar's storytelling skills, ability to mold performances, and pro lensing. It made clear to me he was to become a major director. Of the films from this period, I like Matador and Law of Desire very much. The former introduced Antonio Banderas and both are highly inventive. These two are perhaps best appreciated by gay filmgoers. These are two that feature male-driven narratives (along with Live Flesh and Talk to Her). Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown was more popular and accessible, perhaps a bit tame by his standards. Almodovar entered middle age, so to speak, with the mature and thought-provoking The Flower of My Secret ('95) in which he left behind his "bad boy" image and the stereotype of him being a director of wild comedies. I rather resisted this move at the time but The Flower of My Secret has become one of my favorites (non-fans like J. Rosenbaum think it's his best). This is the first of Almodovar's films featuring a music score composed by the magnificent Alberto Iglesias. Nowadays I cannot conceive of Almodovar making a film without Iglesias. For me, the most moving Almodovar film is All About My Mother ('99). The three films he's made this decade are consistently very good. It'd be difficult for me to pick a favorite among them.

Chris Knipp
12-26-2006, 10:47 PM
I simply did not see Belle Epoque. When Jamon Jamon came out in the Bay Area, an artist visiting from Spain called Caco was at the studio working and everybody liked him and hel loved to talk and we discussed it at length at the time and he explained that it was considered expressive of new points of view and styles in Spain of the time..

When I saw Matador and Law of Desire I could see he had a strong individual style, very campy and gay, very visual and over the top, vivid, well done, and I could see he was going to be around to stay, but I didn't care for it. I agree his style has evolved very descernibly, but all of them are very gay. I would say he has taught the mainstream audience to come to him and understand him. All About My Mother--very gay. Very full of the campy telenovela spirit, no? I saw it in a very gay movie theater in DC. I saw Talk to Me in a theater in London. His storytelling is very weird. Some of the plot elements are incomprehensible. But againl, he has educated the general art-film audience to appreciate what he is doing. And in that one, I could see real total mastery of the medium He is so sure of himself, and the beauty of it is staggering, the movie-within-the-movie, the colors--that one seemed magical. But I still find him kind of an alien--an alien who has become gloriously mainstream. LIke mouton I was interested to see La mala educacion, with Garcia Bernal. And it is great. But for me the best is Talk to Me. I'm waiting to see if another one will please me as much.

At the Volver Q&A of the NYFF he talked about his collaboration with Alberto Iglesias, but I particularly like the Caetano Veloso song in Able con ella.

oscar jubis
12-27-2006, 09:02 PM
I liked what you said earlier that this his own brand of "naturalism" is unique. Indeed, the fact that his many influences (which include Bunuel, Berlanga, and 60s-70s underground cinema besides the ones more commonly mentioned) are traceable doesn't mean his synthesis isn't fresh and original.

From your last post, the only thing with which I could disagree concerns some plot elements being "incomprehensible".

Chris Knipp
12-27-2006, 11:58 PM
I meant incomprehensible in the sense of far-fetched or strange.

oscar jubis
12-28-2006, 12:38 AM
Oh, like Banderas in Matador having clairvoyant visions of actual murders and Almodovar resorting to a solar eclipse to bring together several narrative elements.

By the way, in any other year (definitely last year), Ms. Cruz would become the only actress besides Loren (that I know of) to win an Oscar for Best Actress for a performance in a foreign language. But I think this year Mirren is unbeatable. They both deserve it, but Mirren is a major actress who has never won and might not get another chance.

Chris Knipp
12-28-2006, 12:47 AM
Sort of like that, yes, and the way Talk to Me ends. It's not that I could not follow it, but it just didn't make sense, it was too far fetched, I didn't know what he was getting at.

Oh, come on, Mirren can get another chance! How old is Peter O'Toole? About 74, but he seems older, and may not be in good shape. Liver? Lungs? they've taken a beating. Mirren I'm sure takes good care of herself.

Seeing Venue made me think about that. Have not been able to write a review of it yet..... Yes, a great performance by O'Toole. Thanks to Kuraishi, no sentimentalism or crowd-pleasing; the touching moments are subtle and earned.

Only problem with the Volver performance is that it is derivative from Loren et al. But it is fun and powerful. He got a lot out of the girl. I guess you'd have to say he's good with actors.

Did Banderas become famous just because of Almodovar?

oscar jubis
12-28-2006, 01:10 AM
*When discussing Mirren and her excellent chances to win an Oscar, I was stepping into the mind of an Academy member trying to decide for whom to vote. I could be wrong, but I believe some voters do consider, for example, that Marty Scorsese has never won an Oscar.

*Banderas came to the attention of American producers and directors thanks to Almodovar. But, let's face it, many people didn't know of him until Madonna: Truth or Dare.

Chris Knipp
12-28-2006, 07:57 AM
Of course the academy people do think of those things. But they shouldn't be overwhelmed by them too much.