PDA

View Full Version : Junebug



Chris Knipp
08-20-2005, 05:30 AM
PHIL MORRISON: JUNEBUG (2005)

Southern voices, southern rooms

Review by Chris Knipp

Junebug does a pretty good job of bringing indie dysfunction back into the realm of credibility and just about makes you want to trust Sundance again. Begin with Amy Adams, justly celebrated there. She's the central figure in this story of an estranged brother's return to his North Carolina family with a sophisticated gallerist wife in tow. Amy's the very pregnant sister Ashley, and the only family member who's consistently got both warmth to offer and things to say -- and say and say and say and say. She's a wonder, a joy to watch in action. (Even the trailer's usual gobbling up of best moments can't steal her fire: she's got lots more where those came from.) Everybody's good, in fact, whether they're suspicious, like mama Peg (Celia Weston, herself a South Carolinian by origin); or laconic like daddy Eugene (Scott Wilson, born in Georgia); imploding and unready for fatherhood -- or even conversation with other family members -- like younger brother Johnny, Ashley's husband (Benjamin McKenzie of "The OC," Texas-born); or well-meaningly out of place like the gallerist Madeleine (Embeth Davidtz); or quietly secure, but not up for saying much, like her husband and the returning son and brother, George (Alessandro Nivola, northern-ized by Boston, Exeter, and Yale).

This may sound so actor-centered it's too theatrical, but it's not -- because Morrison keeps things highly visual with a camera that dwells meaningfully but not tendentiously on silent rooms and trees and lawns, building up a sense of southern places almost as subtly as a William Eggleston or a Stephen Shore. (The silences and still images are rather wonderful; the film's occasional musical backgrounds less so.)

The fact that Madeleine has come down with George to lure a Henry Darger-like looney, David Wark (Frank Hoyt Taylor) into her Chicago gallery's stable of outsider artists is almost too much of a metaphor, but certainly a resonant one. For this lady with a cosmopolitan background and English accent (actually Davidtz grew up in South Africa) her husband's family and just about anything that happens, from the hill men's hollers at the film's outset to the church supper where her husband surprises her by being called up to solo in a hymn, is "outsider art" of one kind or another -- as much as Wark's naive, offensive paintings of civil war fantasies where "niggers" have white men's faces. Davidtz has a crucial role to play not only because her character has to focus on keeping Wark from getting stolen away by a New York gallery while a family crisis is afoot, but because her accepting response to Ashley's onslaught of curiosity and puppy love has to seem warm without being condescending. She emerges as basically a nice person, as does even the most screwed up of the group, but that can't save her from missteps -- notably with Johnny -- that show the best manners and heart in the world can't save you in an alien environment.

There are a few things to question, beginning with the artwork and the artist, both of which seem a bit crudely drawn. The use of an outsider artist itself risks caricature. A short sequence of Johnny and his coworkers sounding off at their jobs with Replacements, Ltd. is lively and amusing, but seems spliced in from another movie -- something like Miguel Arteta's 2002 The Good Girl. Nivola's character is rather underdeveloped. And some of the silent spaces are a little too deadpan. Do we really have to watch Eugene watching a mattress being inflated? That's a bit too much like the proverbial watching paint dry.

But in most other ways the directing is good and the writing deft. If you feel a little hungry at the end, that's largely because -- Ashley's loquacity notwithstanding -- too much hasn't been said. There've been no easy tears or jokes or resolutions. Junebug has moments of violence and tragedy, but manages to be de-centered and low-keyed and yet still seem to matter. Madeleine and George drive off in their Volvo with a sigh of relief, and the movie ends there. Morrison and his writer-collaborator Angus McLaughlan work on a little piece of ivory, but they draw well. And they know how to keep their surprises from calling undue attention to themselves.

Posted on Chris Knipp website. (http://www.chrisknipp.com/writing/viewtopic.php?t=455)

oscar jubis
09-09-2005, 01:17 AM
Worth watching because of the opportunity to meet Peg and Ashley (nicely played by Celia Weston and Amy Adams) and because it's imbued with a genuine feeling for its milieu. Junebug's got some very funny moments and a couple of poignant ones too.
What's wrong with the film has more to do with what's missing from it. It has to do with avoidance on the part of Morrison and McLaughlan; it has to do with their passive-aggressive failure to "let the simmering waters come to a boil", so to speak. Johnny molests Madeleine and assaults George conveniently out of anyone's view, and the couple grin and bear it. If these two were Catholics they'd be candidates for sainthood. Incredibly, veteran crit Stanley Kaufmann goes as far as calling Junebug "daring". Junebug is anything but that.

Chris Knipp
09-10-2005, 11:12 PM
Appropriately the Eggleston Documentary is premieiring at Fim Forum where the Darger film premiered last year/
I don't quite see the force of your quibbles, Oscar. Things do often happen out of view of other family members, and in the interest of harmony and moving on, aren't held up for a town meeting. However, "veteran" Stanley Kaufman is no longer battle-ready; while one of the best widely seen indie films of the year so far, isn't what I could call "daring." It is precise, which ismore rare. "Nicely played" is an understatement for Ashley: she's brilliant.

oscar jubis
09-11-2005, 12:34 AM
You're in the majority with regards to the critical opinion of this film. If I decide to make an "over-rated" list for 2005, Junebug would be a strong candidate. It's not that I think it's bad or not worth-watching. And by the way, I'd agree with you calling it "precise" as long as the term is applied to the locale and a few of its characters. The metacritic score of 79 seems to accurately reflect the very positive reviews of the majority of critics. I beg to differ. I did find a couple of reviews with quotes that reflect my reservations about the film.
"a failure of nerve disguised as dramatic ambiguity" (Boston Globe)
"Nivola is hard-pressed to make sense of a character whose moods and motivations remain too opaque and arbitrary" (Variety)

Yes, shit happens out of others' view. But when you show a character bleeding from being hit in the head with a tool (for no apparent reason) and the character doesn't even complain or get angry about it, you're engaged in major cop-out. You have used the phrase "doesn't have a pulse" before, I propose it applies to Junebug. I do see talent here. I envision the rookie director and rookie writer getting the confidence and courage to make a really good movie next time out.

Chris Knipp
09-11-2005, 04:44 PM
I will stick with the majority. But not with enormous enthusiasm. This isn't the kind of film I champion and I don't need to. What I can agree with you on this time through his Nivlola--his performace isn't very interesting. He seems sure of himself, and that can be enough, but his character is quite neutral. Don't you like things not being explained? arsaib was citing Rosenbaum on Benoit Jacquot to that effect. Thints are left to think about. I also didn't though, like the treatment of the Darger artist character. Too self conscious.