PDA

View Full Version : REVIEW: Ong-bak: Thai Warrior (2003)



Chris Knipp
04-20-2005, 05:19 PM
Prachya Pinkaew: Ong-bak: Thai Warrior (2003)

The pure pleasure of the real thing

Review by Chris Knipp

That "Thai Warrior" is Worowit/Panom Yeerum, AKA Tony Jaa, and he's the reason for watching this movie. He's an amazingly gifted young Muai Thai kick boxer and stunt man who did all his leaps and jumps and dives. My favorite moment of all is the one where he's chasing through the streets and dives under a car, slides out the other side, and pops up again all in one smooth motion. Do you think that's easy? It's barely even conceivable. And he does all this without digital manipulation or the wires we've gotten all too familiar with in Chinese martial arts movies. Look for the real thing here, no arty made-for-westerners romances à la Crouching Tiger or Flying Daggers. This is like finding a dirty little restaurant in San Francisco's Tenderloin that has really authentic Vietnamese or Pakistani food. No frills -- just the joy of truly unmediated experience. The story, something about the head from Ting's (Jaa's) village temple's Buddha statue (or ong-bak) whose theft by a gangster's low-level employee disgraces the village and must be restored, is a mere formality, just enough to get things going and give Ting a back story.

Tony Jaa's face is pretty, almost feminine, and his body is stocky and incredibly flexible and strong. Despite a poster for the movie that shows his broad tapered back, you may not notice how well muscled he is at first. None of this movie is about superficial show so much as it's about accomplishment. Jaa's expressions are intent and sensitive, but unlike the Beautiful Boxer star Asanee Suwan (whose character, Nong Toom, is supposed to be a cross-dresser fighting to earn money for a sex change), Jaa doesn't mug in an attempt to act and isn't called upon to do so.

This was a relaxing way to end a movie marathon of three films in one day -- the other two were the Kazakhstan charmer Schizo and the doc about US soldiers in Iraq, Gunner Palace -- because you don't need to take it seriously. In fact you must adopt a mindless attitude watching Ong-bak (which I couldn't for Sin City or Oldboy, hence my difficulty with those two productions) because it contains a lot of bone-crushing violence. Sometimes you can even hear the bones being crushed. The movie has been called "insanely brutal" and that's about right, though all the brutality is pretty much in hand-to-hand fighting and stays close to the kick boxing techniques. You have to focus exclusively on Tony Jaa's physical prowess and remember that this is just a movie -- that people are not really being killed or their heads mashed in -- but if you do so you will be amply rewarded. There are car chases, battles, competitions, sexy girls, and evil gangsters, the kingpin of them all, Khom Tuan (Sukhaaw Phongwilai), being a depraved cripple with a scary voice-box. It's not that there's no plot, just that you'd waste your time taking it seriously.

The other most purely enjoyable sequence in Ong-bak comes even earlier than the street chase, when Ting is demonstrating his training for his Buddhist teacher through adopting a sequence of ritualized positions. This is sheer physical grace, like a dance broken into a series of sudden tableaux, and you realize what a heap of actual art there is in the martial arts. You can't fake this kind of thing, and what impresses in this scene is not the moves and positions in themselves, but the clear sense you get that Tony Jaa knows all this deep in his bones. More than just showing off a series of carefully memorized moves this sequence is like someone with a beautiful voice and perfect diction reciting a long, awesome prayer. It's beyond words, and beyond interpretation. It just is.

It's said that The Making of Ong-bak is even better. Could be. Also it's said that Tony Jaa's going to be bigger than Jackie Chan and Jet Li. That's not too far fetched either. But even if this was only a unique moment in time, it'd be a movie that's truly satisfying to watch for anyone who enjoys seeing the body in graceful, powerful, acrobatic motion. In the world of martial arts stunts, it just doesn't get any better than this.

_____________

Posted on Chris Knipp website. (http://www.chrisknipp.com/writing/viewtopic.php?t=407)

hengcs
04-26-2005, 11:50 AM
The main selling point of the movie is:
-- There are NO wires.
-- All the martial arts are real stunts.
;)

Chris Knipp
04-26-2005, 09:01 PM
Yes. . . . That's what I said . . .

trevor826
05-13-2005, 12:41 PM
Ong-bak: Muay Thai Warrior (2003)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No wires. No computer graphics. No stunt doubles.

Directed by Prachya Pinkaew

You want a good story? forget it!

Need a great script? no hope!

Academy acting? look elsewhere!

So what do you get? Nearly 2 hours of absolutely stunning martial arts action. The story is lame, harking back to the Hong Kong films of the 70's but if you can leave your brain at home you will be entranced by the sheer acrobatic and fighting skills of Tony Jaa which are phenomenal, like a cross between Jet Li and Jackie Chan. The fight scenes are brutal yet at times poetically graceful and the film is fully deserving of the 18 rating it's been given in the UK.

So if you're in need of an adrenalin rush of a movie, forget all the CGI and wire-work go and see Ong Bak, if you don't gasp at least once, you're probably already dead.

Storyline C-
Acting C
Action A

Cheers Trev.

arsaib4
05-13-2005, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by trevor826
Ong-bak: Muay Thai Warrior (2003)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you don't gasp at least once, you're probably already dead.



This makes me wanna test myself! ;)