PDA

View Full Version : SILENT WATERS - A film from Pakistan



Howard Schumann
03-28-2005, 10:48 AM
SILENT WATERS (Khamosh Pani)

Directed by Sabiha Sumar (2003)

In 1947, the Indian sub-continent was partitioned into Muslim West and East Pakistan (later Bangladesh) divided by Hindu-dominated India. Families were uprooted and mass migrations of Muslims and Hindus led to violence, rape, looting, and abductions of women on both sides. The official estimate of the number of abducted women was placed at 50,000 Muslims in India and 33,000 Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan. Some of the women were forced to commit suicide to protect the family "honor" while others ended up marrying their abductors out of self protection, a theme dramatized in Silent Waters, a film by U.S.-educated Pakistani director Sabiha Sumar. Sumar has taken the film all over Pakistan, to cities and small towns alike, in hopes of stimulating a debate about the nature and causes of Islamic extremism.
.
Set in Pakistan in 1979, the film traces the roots of fundamentalism in Pakistan to the overthrow and execution of Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and the ascension of fundamentalist General Zia ul-Haq. It tells the story of a Muslim widow Ayesha (Kirron Kher) who is losing her son to a group of Islamic extremists and the tragic consequences in her own life. Saleem (Aamir Malik, a Gael Bernal look-alike) is a carefree 18-year old courting Zubeida (Shilpa Shukla), an intelligent and ambitious teenager. When his girlfriend goes away to an all-girls college, he is left at home to think about his future and dreams of a life of doing more than working in the fields. Ultimately, his harsh poverty, peer pressure, and a sense of unfulfilled ambition make him a vulnerable target for the Muslim clerics.

Recruited by the zealots in his own village, he quickly becomes an aggressive jihadist, abruptly turning his back on his mother and his girlfriend. Several scenes show the growing fear and intolerance the movement spreads in the name of racial purity: the sudden building of a brick wall around a girls school playground, and the bullying of shop owners to close their doors during prayer time. According to Sumar, "There was just a kind of fear that led people to stop thinking. When fear becomes pervasive, you stop questioning." Ayesha becomes haunted by flashbacks, a recurring dream of a young girl screaming and running from a well. When a group of Sikh pilgrims come to town to pray at the village mosque, enmity flares up again and Ayesha is forced to confront a dark secret in her past and a little-known chapter of violence against women in Pakistan's history.

Silent Waters is a strong indictment of the intolerance and the abuse of women caused by religious differences, yet it's potential is not fully realized. Aside from the introduction of Bollywood-style songs and dances at the beginning that feels out of place, both good guys and bad guys are shown without any nuance or dimensionality, especially the militants who are little more than caricatures and the motivation behind Saleem's easy recruitment is unclear. In spite of these aesthetic considerations, Silent Waters is an important film that helps us to better appreciate the vulnerability of women during times of political crises and the factors that may have led to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. If it encourages us to learn more about the history and times, it will have served an extremely useful purpose. It just could have been so much more.

GRADE: B

arsaib4
03-29-2005, 12:56 AM
I'm glad that you decided to review this film as it kind of got lost among the foreign releases late last year. I agree that the potential was there for a better film but I appreciated the fact that a film like this was made in an environment still stifling from various aspects of fundamentalism not to mention the "soft" dictatorship which exists under our good friend Gen. Pervez Musharaff. I understood the need for having a few Bollywood entrées but the film got stronger as it went on. Also liked the performance from Kiron Kher, who is from India as I remember watching her in the recent remake of Devdas.

Not too many people are aware of this but the partition of 1947 caused the second highest # of casualties in the 20th century after the Holocaust. It's a shame that not much has been documented about the event.

*I believe it was (East) Pakistan that became Bangladesh but I could be wrong.

Howard Schumann
03-29-2005, 01:40 AM
Originally posted by arsaib4
I'm glad that you decided to review this film as it kind of got lost among the foreign releases late last year. I agree that the potential was there for a better film but I appreciated the fact that a film like this was made in an environment still stifling from various aspects of fundamentalism not to mention the "soft" dictatorship which exists under our good friend Gen. Pervez Musharaff. I understood the need for having a few Bollywood entrées but the film got stronger as it went on. Also liked the performance from Kiron Kher, who is from India as I remember watching her in the recent remake of Devdas.

Not too many people are aware of this but the partition of 1947 caused the second highest # of casualties in the 20th century after the Holocaust. It's a shame that not much has been documented about the event.

*I believe it was (East) Pakistan that became Bangladesh but I could be wrong. You're absolutely right. It was East Pakistan of course. What was I thinking? I think as I mentioned that it is an important film that should be seen. I myself had been unaware of the extent of the casualties related to partition. It certainly wasn't very well publicized.

The film did get better but the bad guys were so overdrawn that I could not recognize any real human qualities in them. This is unfortunate because it does not make clear the strength of their appeal to young people like the boy in this film.