PDA

View Full Version : The Chorus -- A Review



Chris Knipp
02-23-2005, 09:07 PM
CHRISTOPHE BARRATIER'S THE CHORUS (LES CHORISTES, 2004)

Caged birds sing

Review by Chris Knipp

There's an air of romance surrounding wayward boys, particularly in the French tradition, where they tend to be poetic as well as mischievous. In The Chorus, Christophe Barratier draws on this tradition and adds some lovely vocal sounds. The Chorus is about an "internat" or reform school where a new principal who writes music tames his young charges, some naughty, some just abandoned, by teaching them to sing in a boys chorus. The school director, Rachin (sounds like Nurse Ratched), François Berléand (of Jacquot's The School of Flesh), is a prissy meany who preaches a philosophy of instant punishment for all real or imagined wrongdoing ("Action-reaction"); but when the new principal, Clément Mathieu (Gérard Jugnot) shows up with a soft approach to his classes and his supervisory duties, he finds allies among the faculty and staff.

The Chorus advances the frequently screened theory that delinquent kids are better charmed than chastened; that if you can find a positive activity they excel in, the misbehavior will die out.

Barratier has had good success with his young actors. The most important boy is the "tête d'ange" (head of an angel), tall, fair-haired Morhange (Jean-Baptiste Maunier), who's often in trouble and refuses to join the choir, till Mathieu catches him singing by himself and discovers his star soloist. Morhange's voice possesses not only a rich natural musicality but the haunting purity only boy sopranos have. Morhange has the most attractive mother, and Mathieu's success in encouraging the boy's singing makes the pudgy, bald man fantasize romance with her -- thus incidentally clearing himself of the suspicion of pedophilia that tends to haunt any all-boys school setting. Mathieu's romantic dream is futile, and he humbly fades away at the story's end, like some Gallic pied piper of boy soprano-dom.

The Chorus takes place in post-war France and its topic and look establish immediate links with a bevy of seminal French films. Wayward French boys turn up in boarding schools that are places of both repression and refuge, as you can see in Jean Vigo's school revolution in Zero for Conduct (1933). The beloved textbook of the French bad-boy tradition is Alain-Fournier's Le Grand Meaulnes (The Wanderer), which was notably filmed by Jean-Pierre Albicocco in 1967. The tradition becomes more autobiographical in Truffaut's 400 Blows, which introduced the director's alter ego, Jean-Pierre Léaud; and in Malle's moving and long-contemplated memoir of a boarding school in wartime, Au Revoir les Enfants (1987). Jean Cocteau mythologized a bad-boy idol who haunted him all his life in the Dargélos of Les Enfants Terribles (1950), made into yet another classic film by Jean-Pierre Melville. This whole idea has remaining traces in the feral youth Gaspard Ulliel plays in André Téchiné's recent Strayed. The Chorus, it is true, is a relatively conventional entry; except for adding music, it rides upon, rather than transcends, the tradition. But it's a warm story with much charm and little pretension.

Barratier himself is a talented musician who, like Mathieu, has drifted into other things. A trained classical guitarist, he won several international competitions after studying at the prestigious École Normale de Musique in Paris, and played professionally for several years. But in 1991 he joined Galatée films to train under his uncle, the renowned actor, producer and writer Jacques Perrin -- who bookends The Chorus as a Morhange who has grown up into a famous classical conductor. For the next decade Barratier was an associate producer and collaborated with Perrin on Children of Lumière, Microcosmos, Himalaya and Winged Migration. Now he has turned his hand to fiction and directed his own film, with success. There is a risk of preciosity and sweetness, mostly avoided by the dryness of both Mathieu and Rachin as characters, as well as the surviving wickness of the boys, especially an arch bad-boy, Mondain (Grégory Gatignol). The point of view is Mathieu's and the mature Morhange's, so the film doesn't go as deep into the boys' psyches as it goes into their voice boxes.

The director is well connected. He's the son of film actress Eva Simonet and besides his uncle his grandparents were also theater people. The Chorus was top box office in France after its release in March 2004. The French critical reception was pretty mixed, and it's been reviled by some in the United States as (in one writer's words) "unbelievably inane, saccharine, and derivative"; "all smooth, nutrient-free clichés." Even the thumbs-up king Roger Ebert didn't like it: "this feels more like a Hollywood wannabe than a French film. Where's the quirkiness, the nuance, the deeper levels?" But it's really a cleanly made, simple, humanistic, and satisfying little film with far less pandering than its critics claim, and whether we like it or not, it's the French Best Foreign Oscar entry, and the little chorus is likely to perform " Vois sur ton chemin" on Awards night (if their voices haven't changed). The relatively minimal mise-en-scène and the period setting link it more with its classic film antecedents than with the overproduced Very Long Engagement (Jeunet's film's Oscar nominations are for décor and photography). Derivative and conventionally themed? Yes. Barratier has acknowledged The Chorus's inspiration in an earlier film, La Cage aux Rossignols (The Nightingales' Cage, 1945), which has the same premise -- and anyone can name a long list of movies about teachers who charm their wayward flock. None of them feels -- or sounds -- quite like this movie, though. And the boys do their own singing: the "tête d'ange" really has the "voix d'ange."

Johann
02-23-2005, 10:11 PM
Never heard of this film until now.

I'll keep an eye out for it- your review is magnifique...

Chris Knipp
02-24-2005, 01:40 AM
Merci. It's not getting much play, especially considering it was so popular in France, but as I said, it hasn't done well critically. American reviewers, missing the nuances, plug it into "Mr. Holland's Opus" or "Dead Poets Society" and find it stereotypically schmaltzy. The gentler French critics don't see those comparisons and are able to call it "un beau film" and find in it a satisfying example of "cinéma populaire." We can too if we open up to it.

hengcs
02-24-2005, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by Johann
Never heard of this film until now.
I'll keep an eye out for it ...

Hi Johann,
it is a few posts down ... ha ha ha
;)

see
http://www.filmwurld.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1103


Hi Chris,
Do you think the SONG should win the Oscar for BEST SONG of the year?

I definitely think it is MUCH MUCH MUCH better than Shrek 2's "Accidentally in Love"!

I also think it is better than The Polar's Express "Believe" (although I like Josh Groban's other songs), or The Motorcycle's Diary's or the last one.

If it did not win, that is because the voters have NOT watched the movie ... hiaks hiaks hiaks ...

Johann
02-24-2005, 05:35 PM
Sorry hengcs!
I haven't read everything on the boards- please forgive.

Your review helps in my mental-picture expectations.

hengcs
02-24-2005, 05:52 PM
Originally posted by Johann
Sorry hengcs!
I haven't read everything on the boards- please forgive.


ha ha ...
don't worry abt it ...
I am just kidding ...

Anyway, if the show wins something in Oscar, I guess it will be screened more widely in United States.

If the show did NOT win any Oscar, I guess it will just fade away ... sigh ... the pragmatism of market and demand ...

Chris Knipp
02-24-2005, 07:28 PM
hengcs--

I can't comment on the Oscar song competition because I've seen neither Polar Express nor Shrek2 -- and I don't want to force myself to watch them just to give an opinion. My guess would be that in a classical sense "Vois sur ton chemin" is nicer, and has, as you say, a beautiful sound.

If arsaib4 "dislikes" The Chorus "very much" as he says on your thread http://www.filmwurld.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1103, we can't use the excuse that he doesn't know French, because he does; he prefers more challenging and sophisticated fare, and most likely he is irritated (with some justification) that such a blatant example of "cinéma populaire" should have pushed out more serious French fare from 2004.

hengcs
02-24-2005, 08:27 PM
Originally posted by Chris Knipp
hengcs--
I can't comment on the Oscar song competition because I've seen neither Polar Express nor Shrek2 ...
If arsaib4 "dislikes" The Chorus "very much" ... we can't use the excuse that he doesn't know French, because he does ...


Hey,
maybe you could catch the other songs simply from Internet, albums at HMV, etc etc etc ...
maybe you could also listen to the songs during Oscar itself ... and make a decision before the announcements.
;)


As for arsaib4 and the "plot", I agree it is a very simple story. It does not try to be sophisticated or anything. But it is a very nice story ... hee hee ... I do NOT think it is the Best Foreign Film of 2004. But I think it is BETTER than what the critics seem upset about. Let me explain ...

(1) Maybe the "hero" who never succeeds at the end, the Mr. Nobody, is more DOWN TO EARTH and struck a chord in many of the French. Unlike many Hollywood movies, the hero did NOT triumph in the end!!! ;PPP
-- In a way, I thought it is more realistic than the ending scene of Dead Poets Society! Frankly, I like Dead Poets Society (I watched it when I was about 17 ... so it meant sth) ... BUT FRANKLY, I thought the ending scene whereby ALL OF THEM STOOD on their chairs, saluting?shouting? MY CAPTAIN is VERY contrived!
-- Somewhere early in the movie of Dead Poets Society, ALL of them were made to tear pages of their text. To me, that scene is also quite contrived?!

(2) Many criticize the movie for suggesting that ALL bad students can be changed and will change. However, if you think properly, there is a character (introduced late) in the movie who challenges the audience' assumption. Can he be changed? Did he steal? Was he wrong to seek revenge by setting fire? etc etc etc ... Likewise, it was actually ANOTHER student (assumed good) who did bad ... is the line that clear?
-- They could possibly plant a good boy, a bad boy, etc etc ... but that to me is even MORE CONTRIVED (pardon me for saying, so Hollywood) ... you must always plant an African American amidst the Whites, at least a gay amidst the straights, etc etc etc ... isn't that MORE contrived?! so "politically" correct ...?!
-- If we bear in mind that it is a movie in ONE SETTING (i.e., that particular boys' home, that particular class), it does make sense! Who say you can't have a class whereby all students change for the better???
-- We are not talking abt trying to make a movie that is more "generalizable" to ALL classes and ALL boys home ... being a sampling of a typical class ...

(3) With regards to knowing French (NOT abt arsaib4), and being French, I guess the French in France may have more "emotional" attachment/cultural feelings/historical basis to FEEL more for the movie! They may be reminded of their father's story, their grandfather's story, etc etc etc

(4) I also learn that some of the songs (sung by the kids during the selection by the teacher) struck a chord somewhere ... it reminds some of them of songs so familiar in those younger/older days ...

;)

Chris Knipp
02-24-2005, 11:19 PM
With regards to knowing French (NOT abt arsaib4), and being French, I guess the French in France may have more "emotional" attachment/cultural feelings/historical basis to FEEL more for the movie! They may be reminded of their father's story, their grandfather's story, etc etc etcDefinitely. And the favorable French critics I read said this. Thus while the movie was not universally well received in France, it was not as cruelly rejected as by some US critics, Walter Chow, the Village Voice; Manohla Dargis even, and Roger Ebert. I think US viewers see another movie, largely one from their imagination projected onto this one, based on some perhaps corny US movie with a classroom subject like Dead Poets Society, Mr Holland's Opus, etc.; they don't see that this is something any different. Besides, US fans of "sophisticated" European movies are disappointed because they don't find this one "sophisticated." It isn't; but that doesn't make it bad. There are nuances, which the non-French person can easily miss.
Maybe the "hero" who never succeeds at the end, the Mr. Nobody, is more DOWN TO EARTH and struck a chord in many of the French. Unlike many Hollywood movies, the hero did NOT triumph in the end!!! Yes, and they say this guy is very known and popular in France and has made 70 movies and directed a dozen or more himself. He is a classic Mediterannean everyman type. This is not appreciated in the US. They just think he's fake; in fact the French audience loves him.
if you think properly, there is a character (introduced late) in the movie who challenges the audience' assumption. Can he be changed?That's Mondain. I agree they didn't' "plant a good boy, bad boy, etc.". in this movie. I agree they could all change--they aren't necessarily that bad, just have bad luck. "Born to lose." Poor, or abandoned by their parents, like the boy in Truffaut's 400 Blows, who's not that bad at all, just a misfit, whose father is lazy.
I also learn that some of the songs (sung by the kids during the selection by the teacher) struck a chord somewhere ... it reminds some of them of songs so familiar in those younger/older days ...
Right; you have guessed a lot of the reasons why the French audience loves the movie. Besides that, as I said it's based on a similar movie that the director saw in his youth.

P.s. I might see if I can find the other Oscar nominated songs online.

ADDENDUM: Well, "Vois sur ton chemin" didn't win Best Song (though a good song won) and Beyonce', who inexplicably got to sing THREE of the Oscar-nominated songs, took the boy soprano soloist's part -- too bad for this kid who has fan clubs now -- and made it sound like some kind of torch song. Pretty maddening; a complete distortion of tone and certainly not the Academy at its best.

Howard Schumann
01-09-2006, 12:05 PM
Another one you will not take too kindly too Chris, sorry.

THE CHORUS (Les Choristes)

Directed by Christophe Barratier (2004)

A middle-aged musician, Clement Mathieu (Gerard Jugnot), arrives at a boarding school for delinquent boys, Fond de l'Etang (Rock Bottom), with fear about his ability to handle the job of teacher and supervisor. His fears become even more real when he meets the overbearing headmaster Rachin (Francois Berleand), a man who takes out his frustrations by dolling out excessive punishments to the children. This is the premise of The Chorus (Les Choristes), a skillfully acted but by-the-numbers effort that fails to deliver any real emotional substance.

Mathieu discovers that some of the boys can sing very well, especially troublemaker Pierre Morhange (Jean-Baptiste Maunier) whose boy soprano voice has a purity that is almost angelic. The teacher pursues a relationship with Pierre's mother Violette (Marie Bunel) and encourages her to visit the school more often, but she falls in love with an engineer without considering Mathieu as a potential father for her son.

The teacher molds the delinquent boys into a heavenly choir (without a great deal of trial and error) and develops a positive relationship with most of them that demonstrates the redemptive power of music and further frustrates the surly headmaster. Although I did find The Chorus entertaining and truly enjoyed some gorgeous music, most of the characters are well-worn stereotypes and the film does not explore any possibilities beyond its tried and true formula.

GRADE: C

Chris Knipp
01-09-2006, 05:12 PM
Your lukewarm response is the usual one, though as I noted I believe critiques were much hasher here than in France.

Theatrical releases:

March 2004--France.
January 2005--Us.

Howard Schumann
01-09-2006, 08:56 PM
Originally posted by Chris Knipp
Your lukewarm response is the usual one. Yep, that's me, just your typical average joe reviewer.

Chris Knipp
01-10-2006, 12:16 AM
You misread me. You take things too personal. I meant that most of the reviewers' reactions were lukewarm, like yours. Your reviews aren't generally lukewarm, that's not what I was saying.